Helpless-Empire
0x3f24c1ab524c159554ca69b909ff2e34ffeb9a68
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
60
Open notional
$2.1K
Total PnL
$-3.2K
Realised
$-9.58
Win rate
17%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 60- NO
Will SSC Napoli vs. Udinese Calcio end in a draw?
1285 shares @ 79.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$1.3K
$269.21
- UNDER
Thunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5
1230 shares @ 62.6¢·now 63.5¢·exp May 25, 2026$781.05
$11.15
- NO
Will RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol end in a draw?
2226 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- NO
Will Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?
1825 shares @ 73.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 12:30AM-12:35AM ET
50 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 1:15AM-1:20AM ET
50 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 12:40AM-12:45AM ET
50 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 1:05AM-1:10AM ET
50 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 12:45AM-12:50AM ET
50 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 1:35AM-1:40AM ET
50 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill SSC Napoli vs. Udinese Calcio end in a draw?$1.0KMay 24, 14:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC end in a draw?$1.0KMay 24, 14:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$44.52May 24, 14:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$89.67May 24, 14:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$89.67May 24, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$89.67May 24, 14:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$23.10May 24, 13:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Shanghai Shenhua FC vs. Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC end in a draw?$731.93May 24, 13:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$3.22May 24, 12:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$66.39May 24, 10:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$93.00May 24, 10:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$93.00May 24, 10:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$93.00May 24, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 225.5$93.00May 24, 10:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol end in a draw?$1.6KMay 23, 18:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?$794.25May 23, 16:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?$182.51May 23, 16:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?$190.07May 23, 16:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano end in a draw?$190.92May 23, 16:10 UTC
- REWARD$1.00Mar 5, 00:15 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $188.88
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 1, 15:17 UTC
- Last active
- May 24, 14:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".