Essential-Utilisation-Array
0x9118bfbbf1329144d8a9ea3e729efbf55a2cdb24
Wallet digest
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$8.09
Total PnL
$-0.59
Realised
$-0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Oscar Piastri finish on the podium at the 2026 F1 Canadian Grand Prix?$4.06May 18, 21:35 UTC
- REDEEMLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Los Angeles Angels$2.89May 17, 05:10 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Mexico win on 2026-06-11?$0.32May 16, 22:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles Dodgers vs. Los Angeles Angels$1.64May 16, 22:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Mexico win on 2026-06-11?$5.05May 16, 22:24 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Kimi Antonelli be the 2026 F1 Drivers' Champion?$5.07May 16, 22:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kimi Antonelli be the 2026 F1 Drivers' Champion?$5.09May 11, 22:30 UTC
- REDEEMKnicks vs. 76ers$5.77May 10, 22:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. 76ers$3.04May 9, 17:49 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $3.47
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 9, 17:49 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 21:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".