Self-Assured-Photo
0x986c1d3fdd1258b7be851b4bbd88157bebc3dbc6
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
58
Open notional
$493.89
Total PnL
$-4.7K
Realised
$316.96
Win rate
50%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 58- UNDER
Thunder vs. Spurs: O/U 222.5
351 shares @ 57.0¢·now 57.5¢·exp May 25, 2026$201.75
$1.75
- SPURS
Thunder vs. Spurs
351 shares @ 57.0¢·now 57.5¢·exp May 25, 2026$201.75
$1.75
- YES
Will Brazil win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
230 shares @ 8.7¢·now 8.9¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$20.57
$0.57
- YES
Will the New York Knicks win the 2026 NBA Finals?
72 shares @ 13.8¢·now 23.2¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$16.78
$6.78
- YES
Will Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
171 shares @ 11.7¢·now 8.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$14.10
$-5.90
- YES
Will Spain win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
65 shares @ 15.4¢·now 17.4¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$11.32
$1.32
- YES
Will England win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
90 shares @ 11.1¢·now 11.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$10.14
$0.14
- YES
Will Japan win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
455 shares @ 2.2¢·now 1.8¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$8.41
$-1.59
- YES
Will Anthropic’s valuation hit (HIGH) $1.75T by June 30?
200 shares @ 3.0¢·now 3.3¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$6.50
$0.50
- YES
Will Anthropic’s valuation hit (LOW) $875B by June 30?
29 shares @ 8.0¢·now 8.5¢·exp Jul 1, 2026$2.47
$0.15
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs$202.58May 24, 15:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Spurs: O/U 222.5$202.58May 24, 15:44 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 4 Winner$151.35May 24, 15:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO5) - LPL Play-In$101.36May 24, 15:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 4 Winner$101.02May 24, 14:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 3 Winner$5.14May 24, 13:34 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 3 Winner$138.90May 24, 13:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 3 Winner$100.90May 24, 12:57 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 3 Winner$144.47May 24, 12:36 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$15.82May 24, 12:31 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$115.00May 24, 12:31 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$39.36May 24, 12:31 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$170.88May 24, 12:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$61.33May 24, 12:08 UTC
- TRADESELLGame Handicap: WB (-2.5) vs LGD Gaming (+2.5)$181.62May 24, 12:02 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: HANJIN BRION vs T1 - Game 2 Winner$384.21May 24, 11:45 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 1 Winner$371.22May 24, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: HANJIN BRION vs T1 - Game 2 Winner$102.22May 24, 11:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 3 Winner$102.25May 24, 11:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs LGD Gaming - Game 2 Winner$31.83May 24, 11:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $190.49
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 24, 05:07 UTC
- Last active
- May 24, 15:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".