Unselfish-Reveal
0x0b77583b58e4f2c67c1ee4b4b3e573d96556ca47
Wallet digest
Activity score
95/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$590.80
Total PnL
$103.06
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$24.44May 10, 02:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$28.32Apr 22, 16:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$49.44Apr 21, 07:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$11.13Apr 20, 06:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$32.20Apr 19, 14:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$3.30Apr 19, 05:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$168.00Apr 19, 04:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Wang win the 2026 Fields Medal?$142.00Apr 18, 01:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Yu Deng win the 2026 Fields Medal?$29.50Apr 18, 01:52 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $54.26
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 18, 01:52 UTC
- Last active
- May 10, 02:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".