Scratchy-Estate
0x0ee8c2f528e067301d2c7f3b78e6ed6f12badb0c
Wallet digest
Activity score
61/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
9
Open notional
$10.38
Total PnL
$-37.04
Realised
$-1.15
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Supernova win NACL 2026 Spring?
35 shares @ 50.0¢·now 15.3¢·exp Jun 5, 2026$5.29
$-11.99
- YES
Will NRG win NACL 2026 Spring?
20 shares @ 50.0¢·now 25.4¢·exp Jun 5, 2026$5.09
$-4.91
- KT ROLSTER
LoL: KT Rolster vs Hanwha Life Esports - Game 2 Winner
7 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-06?
7 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- DN SOOPERS
LoL: DN SOOPers vs HANJIN BRION - Game 1 Winner
7 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- ZETA DIVISION
Valorant: VARREL vs ZETA DIVISION - Map 1 Winner
5 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- HANWHA LIFE ESPORTS
LoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1 - Game 2 Winner
5 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- MULTAN SULTANS
Pakistan Super League: Multan Sultans vs Hyderabad Kingsmen
5 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- TEAM WE
LoL: Team WE vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner
5 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLUFC 328: Sean Strickland vs. Khamzat Chimaev (Middleweight, Main Card)$33.30May 10, 04:57 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Supernova win NACL 2026 Spring?$0.97May 9, 22:16 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Supernova win NACL 2026 Spring?$0.15May 9, 15:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYUFC 328: Sean Strickland vs. Khamzat Chimaev (Middleweight, Main Card)$3.07May 8, 09:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYUFC 328: Sean Strickland vs. Khamzat Chimaev (Middleweight, Main Card)$3.07May 8, 09:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-06?$3.05May 6, 19:15 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Invictus Gaming - Game 2 Winner$6.51May 1, 15:47 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$5.16May 1, 15:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Invictus Gaming - Game 2 Winner$3.05May 1, 12:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1 (BO3) - LCK Rounds 1-2$3.04May 1, 12:19 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Invictus Gaming - Game 1 Winner$4.76May 1, 12:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Invictus Gaming - Game 1 Winner$3.03May 1, 11:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: VARREL vs ZETA DIVISION - Map 1 Winner$3.04May 1, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Hanwha Life Esports vs T1 - Game 2 Winner$3.04May 1, 11:21 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$11.10May 1, 10:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Top Esports vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$5.08May 1, 09:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: DN SOOPers vs HANJIN BRION - Game 1 Winner$3.05May 1, 08:07 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Nongshim Red Force vs T1 - Game 1 Winner$0.00Apr 29, 11:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner$1.02Apr 29, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: KT Rolster vs Hanwha Life Esports - Game 2 Winner$3.05Apr 29, 11:09 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 37
- Avg trade size
- $4.20
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 22, 17:58 UTC
- Last active
- May 10, 04:57 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".