Reasonable-Mover
0x0f62f6ade35058f9bf56fcf69616026a0bbe922e
Wallet digest
Activity score
85/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
27
Open notional
$1.3K
Total PnL
$-2.92
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 27- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $84,000 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$49.98
$0.02
- NO
Will the price of Ethereum be above $2,400 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.98
$0.07
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $84,000 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.98
$0.07
- NO
Will the price of Solana be above $100 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.98
$0.02
- YES
Will the price of Ethereum be above $1,900 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.98
$0.07
- NO
Will the price of Ethereum be less than $1,900 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.95
$0.00
- YES
Bitcoin above 76,000 on May 18, 4AM ET?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.95
$0.00
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be less than $72,000 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.8¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.95
$0.05
- NO
Will the price of Solana be between $100 and $110 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.9¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.95
$0.00
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be between $82,000 and $84,000 on May 18?
50 shares @ 99.7¢·now 99.9¢·exp May 18, 2026$49.95
$0.10
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above 76,400 on May 18, 4AM ET?$49.95May 18, 07:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above 78,600 on May 18, 5AM ET?$49.95May 18, 07:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above 79,000 on May 18, 5AM ET?$49.95May 18, 07:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above 75,000 on May 18, 5AM ET?$49.95May 18, 07:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above 75,400 on May 18, 5AM ET?$49.95May 18, 07:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin above 76,000 on May 18, 4AM ET?$49.95May 18, 07:29 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 77,800 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:26 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 78,200 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:26 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 78,600 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:25 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 76,200 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:25 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 77,400 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:25 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum above 2,165 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:24 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 79,000 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:24 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 75,000 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:24 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 75,400 on May 18, 3AM ET?$50.00May 18, 07:24 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum above 2,090 on May 18, 2AM ET?$50.00May 18, 06:59 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum above 2,105 on May 18, 2AM ET?$50.00May 18, 06:59 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 75,600 on May 18, 2AM ET?$50.00May 18, 06:59 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum above 2,075 on May 18, 2AM ET?$50.00May 18, 06:59 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin above 76,400 on May 18, 2AM ET?$50.00May 18, 06:59 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 10
- Avg trade size
- $49.95
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 06:26 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 07:48 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".