Hungry-Instant
0x1213cf1ea6df841514d7cb58c7b11c15658ce1fe
Wallet digest
Activity score
100/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$311.70
Total PnL
$312.00
Realised
$104.10
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMDogecoin Up or Down - May 12, 1:30AM-1:35AM ET$0.00May 12, 05:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYDogecoin Up or Down - May 12, 1:30AM-1:35AM ET$1.04May 12, 05:32 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 12, 1:20AM-1:25AM ET$1.01May 12, 05:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 12, 1:20AM-1:25AM ET$1.00May 12, 05:24 UTC
- TRADESELLWill LIV Golf announce shutdown in 2026? $0.20May 12, 05:22 UTC
- TRADESELLWill LIV Golf announce shutdown in 2026? $203.09May 4, 23:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill LIV Golf announce shutdown in 2026? $102.82May 3, 05:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill LIV Golf announce shutdown in 2026? $108.00Apr 20, 19:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $69.36
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 20, 19:44 UTC
- Last active
- May 12, 05:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".