Ornery-Swordfight
0x15ac9d4fb9c30fca4fec2fdecde3fdace721f3ba
Wallet digest
Activity score
72/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
41
Open notional
$1.7K
Total PnL
$-1.9K
Realised
$4.07
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 41- UNDER
Michalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5
600 shares @ 78.0¢·now 76.0¢·exp May 25, 2026$456.00
$-11.90
- OVER
Michalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5
600 shares @ 76.0¢·now 72.0¢·exp May 25, 2026$432.00
$-23.90
- OVER
Michalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5
600 shares @ 91.1¢·now 53.5¢·exp May 25, 2026$321.00
$-225.60
- UNDER
Tampa Bay Rays vs. Boston Red Sox: O/U 7.5
101 shares @ 99.0¢·now 52.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$52.53
$-47.48
- TAMPA BAY RAYS
Tampa Bay Rays vs. Boston Red Sox
101 shares @ 67.0¢·now 51.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$51.52
$-16.16
- OVER
Games Total: O/U 3.5
40 shares @ 82.8¢·now 77.5¢·exp May 21, 2026$31.00
$-2.14
- ANYONES LEGEND
Game Handicap: JDG (-1.5) vs Anyone's Legend (+1.5)
40 shares @ 88.0¢·now 65.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$26.00
$-9.20
- OVER
Total Kills Over/Under 25.5 in Game 1?
40 shares @ 96.9¢·now 63.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$25.40
$-13.34
- OVER
Total Kills Over/Under 26.5 in Game 1?
40 shares @ 96.9¢·now 61.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$24.40
$-14.34
- G2 ESPORTS
LoL: Karmine Corp vs G2 Esports - Game 1 Winner
40 shares @ 64.0¢·now 59.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$23.80
$-1.80
Recent activity
- REDEEMGeneva Open: Sebastian Baez vs Alex Michelsen$300.00May 18, 12:33 UTC
- REDEEMBaez vs. Michelsen: Match O/U 23.5$20.00May 18, 12:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYFokina vs. Moutet: Match O/U 21.5$19.81May 18, 12:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 54.5 in Game 1?$3.89May 18, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 54.5 in Game 1?$2.54May 18, 11:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYFokina vs. Moutet: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5$19.81May 18, 11:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5$56.24May 18, 10:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5$198.00May 18, 10:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5$99.00May 18, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5$235.54May 18, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5$229.64May 18, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5$229.54May 18, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 9.5$194.55May 18, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYMichalski vs. Sharipov: Set 1 Games O/U 10.5$235.45May 18, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYBaez vs. Michelsen: Match O/U 23.5$19.81May 18, 10:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYGeneva Open: Sebastian Baez vs Alex Michelsen$297.09May 18, 10:00 UTC
- REDEEMSevilla FC vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 8.5 Total Corners$600.00May 18, 06:08 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: CF Pachuca (-1.5)$149.98May 18, 06:05 UTC
- REDEEMCF Pachuca leading at halftime?$66.66May 18, 05:32 UTC
- REDEEMPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: Draw at halftime?$28.45May 18, 05:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 15
- Avg trade size
- $123.32
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 02:11 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 12:33 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".