Blaring-Politics
0x1c73f3abb6595a2fabb71b578e4a0c860601dd8f
Wallet digest
Activity score
58/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
41
Open notional
$5.79
Total PnL
$-122.80
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 41- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?
69 shares @ 2.9¢·now 3.6¢·exp May 18, 2026$2.52
$0.52
- UNDER
GV CD San José vs. CD Real Tomayapo: O/U 2.5
3 shares @ 36.0¢·now 45.5¢·exp May 12, 2026$1.26
$0.26
- YES
Will Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC end in a draw?
13 shares @ 8.0¢·now 8.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$1.06
$0.06
- YES
Will FC Metaloglobus București win on 2026-05-18?
11 shares @ 9.0¢·now 8.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.94
$-0.06
- YES
Will FK Oleksandriya win on 2026-05-08?
67 shares @ 5.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 8, 2026$0.00
$-3.69
- YES
Will SC Braga win on 2026-05-07?
42 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-8.00
- UNDER
SC Freiburg vs. SC Braga: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
30 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-19.00
- YES
SC Braga leading at halftime?
28 shares @ 18.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UNDER
Falkirk FC vs. Rangers FC: O/U 5.5
27 shares @ 26.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
- UNDER
FC Barcelona vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 3.5
23 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill FC Metaloglobus București win on 2026-05-18?$1.03May 18, 14:53 UTC
- TRADESELLNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 3.5$1.86May 18, 01:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC end in a draw?$1.03May 18, 01:16 UTC
- TRADESELLWill CA Nacional Potosí win on 2026-05-17?$0.13May 18, 00:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 3.5$1.03May 18, 00:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 4.5$1.02May 18, 00:38 UTC
- TRADESELLWill SC Recife win on 2026-05-17?$0.45May 18, 00:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?$2.06May 17, 23:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CA Nacional Potosí win on 2026-05-17?$1.02May 17, 23:26 UTC
- TRADESELLAssociação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 4.5$1.62May 17, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAssociação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 4.5$1.02May 17, 22:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Fortaleza EC win on 2026-05-17?$2.04May 17, 22:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SC Recife win on 2026-05-17?$2.03May 17, 21:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fortaleza EC win on 2026-05-17?$1.02May 17, 21:09 UTC
- TRADESELLOlympique Lyonnais vs. Racing Club de Lens: O/U 5.5$1.33May 17, 20:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique Lyonnais vs. Racing Club de Lens: O/U 5.5$1.01May 17, 20:21 UTC
- TRADESELLOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 4.5$2.96May 17, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-05-17?$4.67May 17, 19:50 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Udinese Calcio win on 2026-05-17?$0.65May 17, 19:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 4.5$2.04May 17, 19:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $2.62
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 19:07 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 14:53 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".