Blind-Asparagus
0x21eef0b2d7c2ad6bfef767fbafac40f94fa378ff
Wallet digest
Activity score
51/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
9
Open notional
$0.34
Total PnL
$-13.5K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will FK Kudrivka win on 2026-05-16?
682 shares @ 88.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.34
$-599.66
- UNDER
Associação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 4.5
3408 shares @ 73.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.5K
- UNDER
Al Shabab Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: O/U 3.5
3250 shares @ 92.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
- UNDER
Manchester United FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 4.5
2927 shares @ 82.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.4K
- NO
Will Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-13?
2497 shares @ 72.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-1.8K
- UNDER
SS Juve Stabia vs. AC Monza: O/U 2.5
1704 shares @ 82.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-1.4K
- UNDER
FK Bodø/Glimt vs. Tromsø IL: O/U 4.5
1163 shares @ 86.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- YES
Will RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-12?
934 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-663.24
- UNDER
Al Shabab Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: O/U 4.5
181 shares @ 80.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2026$0.00
$-145.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill FK Kudrivka win on 2026-05-16?$602.16May 18, 09:30 UTC
- REDEEMRed Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: O/U 2.5$602.58May 18, 04:44 UTC
- REDEEMAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano: O/U 3.5$1.43May 18, 03:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYRed Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: O/U 2.5$520.40May 17, 23:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYAssociação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 4.5$2.5KMay 17, 22:02 UTC
- TRADESELLAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano: O/U 2.5$1.5KMay 17, 22:01 UTC
- TRADESELLAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano: O/U 2.5$71.89May 17, 22:01 UTC
- TRADESELLAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano: O/U 3.5$1.4KMay 17, 22:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano: O/U 2.5$1.5KMay 17, 21:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYAA Argentinos Juniors vs. CA Belgrano: O/U 3.5$1.4KMay 17, 21:17 UTC
- TRADESELLOlympique Lyonnais vs. Racing Club de Lens: O/U 4.5$1.3KMay 17, 21:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique Lyonnais vs. Racing Club de Lens: O/U 4.5$1.2KMay 17, 20:52 UTC
- TRADESELLLille OSC vs. AJ Auxerre: O/U 3.5$1.3KMay 17, 20:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYLille OSC vs. AJ Auxerre: O/U 3.5$1.0KMay 17, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Shabab Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: O/U 4.5$145.87May 17, 19:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Shabab Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$3.0KMay 17, 19:02 UTC
- TRADESELLRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Villarreal CF: O/U 3.5$3.2KMay 17, 18:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Villarreal CF: O/U 3.5$2.5KMay 17, 18:29 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$2.4KMay 17, 18:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$2.3KMay 17, 18:00 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $1.3K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 16:39 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 09:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".