Inconsequential-Zebra
0x23c7f4f71e27a87e975db3e492ef3d8139c53b49
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
68
Open notional
$1.3K
Total PnL
$-529.24
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 68- NO
Predict.fun FDV above $2B one day after launch?
50 shares @ 93.3¢·now 94.7¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$47.33
$0.67
- NO
Reya FDV above $300M one day after launch?
50 shares @ 86.0¢·now 93.7¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$46.83
$3.83
- NO
Opensea FDV above $2B one day after launch?
50 shares @ 91.2¢·now 93.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$46.75
$1.15
- NO
Predict.fun FDV above $1.5B one day after launch?
50 shares @ 95.0¢·now 92.7¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$46.35
$-1.15
- NO
Abstract FDV above $1.5B one day after launch?
50 shares @ 94.0¢·now 92.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$46.00
$-1.00
- NO
Extended FDV above $800M one day after launch?
50 shares @ 90.0¢·now 91.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$45.75
$0.75
- NO
GRVT FDV above $800M one day after launch?
50 shares @ 93.0¢·now 90.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$45.02
$-1.48
- NO
Pacifica FDV above $500M one day after launch?
50 shares @ 91.0¢·now 88.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$44.00
$-1.50
- NO
Abstract FDV above $1B one day after launch?
50 shares @ 90.0¢·now 83.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$41.50
$-3.50
- NO
Abstract FDV above $800M one day after launch?
50 shares @ 80.0¢·now 82.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$41.00
$1.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMMegaETH market cap (FDV) >$4B one day after launch?$10.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMMegaETH market cap (FDV) >$6B one day after launch?$10.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMSpace FDV above $80M one day after launch?$20.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMMegaETH market cap (FDV) >$3B one day after launch?$30.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMGensyn FDV above $600M one day after launch?$30.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMGensyn FDV above $1B one day after launch?$50.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMGensyn FDV above $800M one day after launch?$50.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMMegaETH market cap (FDV) >$2B one day after launch?$50.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMSpace FDV above $100M one day after launch?$50.00May 4, 07:15 UTC
- REDEEMFluent FDV above $200M one day after launch?$49.53Apr 29, 09:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYDreamcash FDV above $300M one day after launch?$4.40Apr 28, 08:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYDreamcash FDV above $300M one day after launch?$4.40Apr 23, 04:35 UTC
- REDEEMOctra FDV above $300M one day after launch?$20.00Apr 22, 17:44 UTC
- REDEEMSentio FDV above $100M one day after launch?$30.00Apr 22, 17:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYPharos FDV above $800M one day after launch?$46.15Apr 15, 05:32 UTC
- REDEEMOver $6M committed to the Fluent public sale?$49.77Apr 14, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpace FDV above $80M one day after launch?$17.62Apr 12, 20:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYGenius FDV above $200M one day after launch?$6.40Apr 12, 12:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYGensyn FDV above $600M one day after launch?$26.70Apr 11, 17:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYUnit FDV above $1B one day after launch?$22.50Apr 11, 17:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 29
- Avg trade size
- $21.19
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 1, 14:37 UTC
- Last active
- May 4, 07:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".