Used-Accountability
0x23cbb95c90eef4e26dcc3982c3cdef33cba8745b
Wallet digest
Activity score
59/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$59.59
Total PnL
$-40.41
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Jasmeet Bains advance from the CA-22 Primary?
55 shares @ 87.2¢·now 54.0¢·exp Jun 2, 2026$29.95
$-18.39
- NO
Will Randy Villegas advance from the CA-22 Primary?
56 shares @ 62.4¢·now 52.0¢·exp Jun 2, 2026$29.03
$-5.81
- NO
Will David Valadao advance from the CA-22 Primary?
48 shares @ 34.8¢·now 1.3¢·exp Jun 2, 2026$0.60
$-16.22
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Jasmeet Bains advance from the CA-22 Primary?$48.34Feb 24, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Randy Villegas advance from the CA-22 Primary?$34.84Feb 24, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill David Valadao advance from the CA-22 Primary?$16.82Feb 24, 17:54 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $33.33
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 24, 17:54 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 24, 17:55 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".