Admirable-Quartz
0x2c00c1a8f3da7435c39acdc63128b29ba8cf1db2
Wallet digest
Activity score
83/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$1.1K
Total PnL
$-2.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $1,000,000 by December 31, 2026?$1.1KFeb 27, 12:46 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $1,000,000 by December 31, 2025?$1.1KFeb 27, 12:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $1,000,000 by December 31, 2025?$1.1KDec 22, 04:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Ethereum hit $17,000 by December 31?$10.1KDec 19, 02:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum hit $17,000 by December 31?$10.1KDec 1, 10:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $200,000 in November?$10.1KDec 1, 09:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $200,000 in November?$10.0KNov 5, 04:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $200k in October?$10.0KNov 5, 04:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $200k in October?$10.0KOct 22, 06:21 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $7.1K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 22, 06:21 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 27, 12:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".