Sympathetic-Adrenalin
0x308a01672908a63393434a8700fc939f2aa595ff
Wallet digest
Activity score
74/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$262.50
Total PnL
$-1.9K
Realised
$-32.14
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Monero hit $1000 in 2026?
2500 shares @ 48.4¢·now 10.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$262.50
$-946.35
- YES
Will Anca Alexandrescu be the next Mayor of Bucharest?
1454 shares @ 3.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-45.07
- NO
Over $18M committed to the Space public sale?
784 shares @ 29.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$0.00
$-230.70
- NO
Will Ethereum reach $4600 September 8–14?
725 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 15, 2025$0.00
$-500.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 1, 12:45PM-1:00PM ET
100 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-69.00
- NO
Will VfB Stuttgart win on 2025-10-05?
90 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 5, 2025$0.00
$-28.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 1, 1:00PM-1:15PM ET
56 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-27.20
- NO
Ethereum above $4400 on September 3?
22 shares @ 67.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 3, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$2.81Apr 16, 01:00 UTC
- TRADESELLStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of April?$202.50Apr 15, 22:51 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$240.01Apr 15, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of April?$199.80Apr 15, 20:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$225.00Apr 15, 20:07 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$113.11Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$20.00Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$7.86Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$89.42Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$9.60Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$51.77Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A$178.23Apr 15, 20:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Ethereum be above $1,900 on February 27?$171.92Mar 4, 19:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Ethereum be above $1,900 on February 27?$166.25Feb 26, 20:21 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Solana be above $70 on February 25?$166.24Feb 25, 21:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Solana be above $70 on February 25?$163.91Feb 24, 18:54 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter dip to $1 before 2027?$461.53Feb 1, 14:21 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter dip to $1 before 2027?$17.10Feb 1, 12:51 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter dip to $1 before 2027?$1.62Feb 1, 08:41 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lighter dip to $1 before 2027?$171.00Feb 1, 08:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $142.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 28, 05:14 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 16, 01:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".