Demanding-Standoff
0x325f0e5b5afc66ff54102d850f67f0c621304511
Wallet digest
Activity score
35/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-50.4K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- YES
Will Al Hazem SC win on 2026-01-22?
40490 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-153.90
- LIQUID
Counter-Strike: Liquid vs Team Falcons - Map 1 Winner
21289 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-305.29
- YES
Will Western Sydney Wanderers FC win on 2026-03-20?
17000 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 20, 2026$0.00
$-168.03
- MASONIC
Counter-Strike: MASONIC vs MINLATE (BO3) - CCT Europe Series #14 Play-In Group D
16368 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-44.77
- UNDER
Al Taawoun Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5
10994 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-74.23
- YES
Will NEOM SC win on 2026-05-16?
10440 shares @ 4.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-428.84
- YES
Will Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-01-19?
9677 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-58.89
- OVER
Sporting CP vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 3.5
8183 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-27.99
- NO
Will FK Bodø/Glimt win on 2026-01-20?
7485 shares @ 9.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 20, 2026$0.00
$-722.62
- YES
Exact Score: Paris Saint-Germain FC 3 - 2 FC Bayern München?
6271 shares @ 11.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 28, 2026$0.00
$-746.31
Recent activity
- REDEEMSpread: Pumas de la UNAM (-2.5)$30.66May 18, 06:08 UTC
- REDEEMPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 2.5$996.18May 18, 06:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill Pumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca end in a draw?$202.55May 18, 06:08 UTC
- REDEEMPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$512.22May 18, 06:07 UTC
- REDEEMPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 3.5$936.73May 18, 06:07 UTC
- REDEEMPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 4.5$187.00May 18, 06:07 UTC
- REDEEMWill CF Pachuca win on 2026-05-17?$363.74May 18, 06:07 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Nashville SC 2 - 1 Los Angeles FC?$19.23May 18, 05:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Nashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC end in a draw?$525.52May 18, 05:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Nashville SC win on 2026-05-17?$739.38May 18, 05:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill Los Angeles FC win on 2026-05-17?$499.55May 18, 05:44 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Nashville SC (-1.5)$456.98May 18, 05:41 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Nashville SC (-2.5)$15.00May 18, 05:40 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Los Angeles FC (-2.5)$7.76May 18, 05:40 UTC
- REDEEMNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 4.5$179.59May 18, 05:39 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Los Angeles FC (-1.5)$169.98May 18, 05:39 UTC
- REDEEMNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 2.5$198.05May 18, 05:36 UTC
- REDEEMNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 3.5$860.26May 18, 05:36 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Concepción vs. Everton de Viña del Mar end in a draw?$165.15May 18, 05:36 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: CD Concepción 0 - 1 Everton de Viña del Mar?$9.62May 18, 05:34 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 04:47 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 06:08 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".