Plain-Information
0x353cb8a9342a39f639a2163ad079badb793d01d9
Wallet digest
Activity score
68/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
103
Open notional
$987.85
Total PnL
$-19.7K
Realised
$-14.20
Win rate
33%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 103- NO
Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: Both Teams to Score
875 shares @ 64.0¢·now 64.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$564.38
$4.38
- NO
Will Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC win on 2026-05-19?
395 shares @ 70.8¢·now 69.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$274.63
$-5.37
- YES
Will Chengdu Rongcheng FC win on 2026-05-19?
231 shares @ 65.0¢·now 64.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$148.85
$-1.15
- YES
Will XRP reach $3.00 in April?
16091 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-167.17
- YES
Will Villarreal CF win on 2026-05-10?
5714 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- YES
Will US Lecce vs. Juventus FC end in a draw?
4286 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-900.00
- YES
Will Stade Brestois 29 win on 2026-05-10?
3121 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-218.48
- YES
Chelsea FC vs. Manchester City FC: Both Teams to Score
2586 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- YES
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-06?
2459 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
- YES
Will SC Freiburg vs. SC Braga end in a draw?
2002 shares @ 7.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC win on 2026-05-19?$282.45May 18, 08:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chengdu Rongcheng FC win on 2026-05-19?$151.57May 18, 08:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: Both Teams to Score$566.05May 18, 08:19 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-05-17?$135.14May 18, 01:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-05-17?$100.78May 17, 19:05 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$760.08May 17, 18:53 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-05-17?$1.1KMay 17, 18:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Fulham FC end in a draw?$346.13May 17, 17:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Fulham FC end in a draw?$91.99May 17, 13:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$355.67May 17, 13:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-05-17?$30.30May 17, 13:37 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$294.66May 17, 13:21 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Genoa CFC win on 2026-05-17?$184.99May 17, 13:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AS Roma win on 2026-05-17?$136.13May 17, 02:58 UTC
- TRADESELLWill SS Lazio win on 2026-05-17?$135.65May 17, 02:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Wolverhampton Wanderers FC win on 2026-05-17?$879.12May 17, 02:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Genoa CFC win on 2026-05-17?$150.85May 17, 02:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SS Lazio win on 2026-05-17?$153.87May 17, 02:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$202.40May 17, 02:46 UTC
- REDEEMWill Al Hilal Saudi Club win on 2026-05-16?$1.3KMay 16, 22:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $533.44
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 11, 12:41 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 08:39 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".