Closed-Nestling
0x37c2a8c9408309ee36662d534f94ec603617c82b
Wallet digest
Activity score
61/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$71.64
Total PnL
$-7.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Solana be between $130 and $140 on May 19?$71.60May 17, 12:02 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $130 April 20-26?$13.48May 17, 12:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill Solana reach $120 April 20-26?$58.15May 17, 12:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $120 April 20-26?$58.10Apr 23, 02:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Solana reach $130 April 20-26?$13.47Apr 23, 02:25 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ethereum reach $2,800 in March?$71.57Apr 23, 02:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum reach $2,800 in March?$71.50Mar 30, 08:29 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$1.52Mar 14, 01:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Ethereum be above $2,100 on March 14?$7.3KMar 13, 10:12 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $1.5K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 13, 10:12 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 12:02 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".