Specific-First
0x38e664b11f47d9c45fb28feb4636f2c6e05f7cf2
Wallet digest
Activity score
58/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
17
Open notional
$7.34
Total PnL
$-4.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 17- NO
Will Kinetiq reach $0.5 before 2027?
13 shares @ 55.0¢·now 56.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$7.34
$0.19
- DOWN
XRP Up or Down - February 22, 4PM ET
6010 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-3.0K
- UP
Solana Up or Down - January 19, 12AM ET
2010 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
- UP
Solana Up or Down - January 18, 8:00AM-12:00PM ET
20 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- UP
Solana Up or Down - January 22, 1PM ET
11 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 22, 2026$0.00
$-5.50
- NO
Will Ethereum dip to $2,200 in February?
10 shares @ 77.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-7.70
- NEFTEKHIMIK NIZHNEKAMSK
KHL: Amur Khabarovsk vs. Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk
10 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - March 4, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET
10 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 4, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UP
Solana Up or Down - February 19, 7AM ET
10 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- UP
Solana Up or Down - March 7, 12:00PM-4:00PM ET
10 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 8, 5:00AM-9:00AM ET$5.00Mar 8, 01:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - March 7, 12:00PM-4:00PM ET$5.00Mar 7, 05:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - March 4, 12:00AM-4:00AM ET$5.00Mar 4, 02:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYKHL: Amur Khabarovsk vs. Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk$4.00Mar 1, 07:13 UTC
- REDEEMXRP Up or Down - February 25, 12PM ET$12.0KFeb 25, 20:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - February 25, 12PM ET$6.0KFeb 25, 15:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - February 22, 4PM ET$3.0KFeb 22, 19:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down - February 20, 8:50PM-8:55PM ET$5.10Feb 21, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - February 20, 8:45PM-8:50PM ET$5.00Feb 21, 01:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - February 19, 7AM ET$5.00Feb 19, 10:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - February 19, 5:35AM-5:40AM ET$5.00Feb 19, 10:29 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 16, 4:00AM-8:00AM ET$10.00Feb 19, 10:14 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 13, 10:05AM-10:10AM ET$0.00Feb 16, 02:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 16, 4:00AM-8:00AM ET$5.00Feb 16, 02:10 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - February 13, 10:05AM-10:10AM ET$10.00Feb 16, 02:08 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$0.02Feb 14, 00:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - February 13, 10:05AM-10:10AM ET$4.90Feb 13, 15:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump say "Transgender" this week? (February 8)$2.80Feb 5, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,200 in February?$7.70Jan 31, 09:17 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - January 23, 12:00PM-4:00PM ET$10.00Jan 25, 17:59 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $422.51
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 16, 05:07 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 8, 01:48 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".