Unfit-Walnut
0x41bc193863697fe05e82202eb390694c85684e5f
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
31
Open notional
$14.85
Total PnL
$-215.38
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 31- OVER
CD Leganés vs. SD Huesca: O/U 2.5
29 shares @ 51.0¢·now 50.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$14.85
$-0.15
- YES
Netanyahu out by March 31?
128 shares @ 3.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- OVER
Club Atlético de Madrid vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 3.5
43 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
FC Bayern München vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 4.5
38 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-16.00
- OVER
Clube do Remo vs. EC Bahia: O/U 3.5
32 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-8.00
- YES
Will CF Estrela da Amadora win on 2026-05-16?
26 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will SV Ried win on 2026-05-16?
26 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-05-11?
26 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 11, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
VfL Wolfsburg vs. FC Bayern München: O/U 4.5
25 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- OVER
Red Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: O/U 2.5
21 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCD Leganés vs. SD Huesca: O/U 2.5$15.22May 18, 12:03 UTC
- REDEEMOlympique Lyonnais vs. Racing Club de Lens: O/U 3.5$25.64May 18, 11:58 UTC
- REDEEMPSV vs. FC Twente '65: O/U 4.5$20.00May 17, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique Lyonnais vs. Racing Club de Lens: O/U 3.5$10.18May 17, 04:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYRed Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: O/U 2.5$10.16May 17, 04:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYRed Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: Both Teams to Score$10.16May 17, 04:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYPSV vs. FC Twente '65: O/U 4.5$7.14May 17, 04:03 UTC
- REDEEMSC Internacional vs. CR Vasco da Gama: Both Teams to Score$37.50May 17, 03:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Internacional vs. CR Vasco da Gama: Both Teams to Score$18.28May 16, 21:01 UTC
- REDEEMWuhan San Zhen FC vs. Liaoning Tieren FC: O/U 3.5$17.24May 16, 16:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYYunnan Yukun FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 4.5$5.10May 16, 10:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWuhan San Zhen FC vs. Liaoning Tieren FC: O/U 3.5$5.11May 16, 10:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CF Estrela da Amadora win on 2026-05-16?$5.12May 16, 10:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill SV Ried win on 2026-05-16?$5.12May 16, 10:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYAssociação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Botafogo FR: Both Teams to Score$10.15May 14, 02:23 UTC
- REDEEMVillarreal CF vs. Sevilla FC: O/U 3.5$14.71May 14, 02:20 UTC
- REDEEMWill Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-13?$16.67May 14, 02:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYClube do Remo vs. EC Bahia: O/U 3.5$8.18May 13, 02:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYVillarreal CF vs. Sevilla FC: O/U 3.5$5.10May 13, 02:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-13?$5.10May 13, 02:02 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $9.29
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 5, 17:39 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 12:03 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".