Specific-Surgery
0x55f3852a9ba1f75298ff10578822fdf8d8189de1
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
11
Open notional
$17.03
Total PnL
$-2.97
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- NO
Hantavirus pandemic in 2026?
11 shares @ 91.3¢·now 92.8¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$10.17
$0.17
- NO
Will Gustavo Petro be the next leader out before 2027?
2 shares @ 59.0¢·now 62.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$1.05
$0.05
- UNDER
Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 5.5
1 shares @ 84.0¢·now 84.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$1.01
$0.01
- UNDER
Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 5.5
1 shares @ 91.0¢·now 91.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$1.00
$0.00
- NO
Will France win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
1 shares @ 82.3¢·now 81.8¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$0.99
$-0.01
- UNDER
AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 5.5
1 shares @ 89.0¢·now 87.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.98
$-0.02
- UNDER
CA Rosario Central vs. Universidad Central de Venezuela FC: O/U 4.5
1 shares @ 85.0¢·now 82.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.96
$-0.04
- UNDER
FC Nantes vs. Toulouse FC: O/U 4.5
1 shares @ 95.0¢·now 82.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.86
$-0.14
- UNDER
Associação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 4.5
1 shares @ 89.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- UNDER
Real Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Valencia CF: O/U 4.5
1 shares @ 91.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMCA Paranaense vs. CR Flamengo: O/U 4.5$1.09May 18, 05:57 UTC
- REDEEMRed Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: O/U 4.5$1.15May 18, 05:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYCA Paranaense vs. CR Flamengo: O/U 4.5$1.00May 17, 21:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYAssociação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 4.5$1.00May 17, 21:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 5.5$1.00May 17, 21:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 5.5$1.00May 17, 21:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 5.5$1.00May 17, 21:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYRed Bull Bragantino vs. EC Vitória: O/U 4.5$1.00May 17, 21:19 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Barcelona vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 4.5$1.42May 17, 21:12 UTC
- REDEEMRed Star FC vs. Rodez Aveyron Football: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:10 UTC
- REDEEMGainare Tottori vs. Reilac Shiga: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMVillarreal CF vs. Sevilla FC: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMOrlando City SC vs. Philadelphia Union: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMSeattle Sounders FC vs. San Jose Earthquakes: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMFC Dallas vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMAston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMNew York Red Bulls vs. Columbus Crew: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMSan Diego FC vs. Austin FC: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMFC Cincinnati vs. Inter Miami CF: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
- REDEEMRC Celta de Vigo vs. Levante UD: O/U 4.5$0.00May 17, 21:08 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 23
- Avg trade size
- $1.16
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 14, 22:13 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 05:57 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".