0x66251f0ec4928600bf621430a7264852923d7a6b
0x66251f0ec4928600bf621430a7264852923d7a6b
Wallet digest
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
6
Open notional
$27.38
Total PnL
$-77.71
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Hong Kong have less than 180mm of precipitation in May?
49 shares @ 31.3¢·now 33.0¢·exp May 31, 2026$16.07
$0.81
- YES
Will Seattle have less than 0.5 inches of precipitation in May?
24 shares @ 72.0¢·now 46.5¢·exp May 31, 2026$11.30
$-6.20
- YES
Will Seattle have less than 2.5 inches of precipitation in April?
289 shares @ 17.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-50.87
- YES
Will Seoul have between 50-55mm of precipitation in April?
52 shares @ 19.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-9.97
- YES
Will NYC have between 3 and 4 inches of precipitation in April?
21 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-1.47
- NO
Will Seoul have less than 40mm of precipitation in April?
12 shares @ 81.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Hong Kong have less than 130mm of precipitation in April?$13.85May 4, 07:29 UTC
- REDEEMWill Hong Kong have 190mm or more of precipitation in April?$18.33May 4, 07:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 0.5 inches of precipitation in May?$0.14May 3, 21:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 0.5 inches of precipitation in May?$2.88May 3, 21:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 0.5 inches of precipitation in May?$14.49May 3, 21:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Kong have less than 180mm of precipitation in May?$1.38May 3, 21:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hong Kong have less than 180mm of precipitation in May?$14.40May 3, 21:25 UTC
- REDEEMWill NYC have less than 2 inches of precipitation in April?$23.30May 3, 02:56 UTC
- REDEEMWill NYC have between 2 and 3 inches of precipitation in April?$41.30May 3, 02:56 UTC
- REDEEMWill Seattle have between 2.5 and 3 inches of precipitation in April?$50.00May 3, 02:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seoul have between 50-55mm of precipitation in April?$2.84Apr 23, 16:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seoul have between 50-55mm of precipitation in April?$1.33Apr 23, 16:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seoul have between 50-55mm of precipitation in April?$1.83Apr 23, 16:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seoul have between 50-55mm of precipitation in April?$3.97Apr 23, 16:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have between 2.5 and 3 inches of precipitation in April?$4.40Apr 23, 13:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have between 2.5 and 3 inches of precipitation in April?$18.00Apr 23, 12:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 2.5 inches of precipitation in April?$12.00Apr 23, 12:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 2.5 inches of precipitation in April?$9.00Apr 23, 12:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 2.5 inches of precipitation in April?$7.50Apr 23, 01:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Seattle have less than 2.5 inches of precipitation in April?$0.69Apr 23, 01:51 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $8.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 20, 11:26 UTC
- Last active
- May 4, 07:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".