Male-Intervenor
0x7f2949f207a5b3bfd1d2a7d15e040c35c877f03d
Wallet digest
Activity score
52/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
78
Open notional
$155.70
Total PnL
$-20.3K
Realised
$-360.35
Win rate
0%
10 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 78- UNDER
Tampa Bay Rays vs. Boston Red Sox: O/U 8.5
439 shares @ 57.0¢·now 35.5¢·exp May 9, 2026$155.70
$-94.30
- OVER
St. Louis Cardinals vs. San Diego Padres: O/U 7.5
4335 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 8, 2026$0.00
$-2.3K
- PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES
Athletics vs. Philadelphia Phillies
2253 shares @ 55.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-1.2K
- SEATTLE MARINERS
Seattle Mariners vs. Chicago White Sox
1496 shares @ 36.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-540.26
- OVER
Girona FC vs. RCD Mallorca: O/U 2.5
1378 shares @ 50.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-700.00
- OVER
Atalanta BC vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 2.5
1173 shares @ 55.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-654.35
- YES
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-04-28?
1121 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 28, 2026$0.00
$-392.20
- YES
Will Real Sociedad de Fútbol win on 2026-05-04?
1061 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-350.00
- OVER
Borussia Mönchengladbach vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 2.5
1012 shares @ 58.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-591.99
- OVER
New York Mets vs. Colorado Rockies: O/U 9.5
995 shares @ 50.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMNew York Yankees vs. New York Mets$0.54May 18, 02:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Nashville SC win on 2026-05-17?$348.67May 18, 02:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Nashville SC win on 2026-05-17?$254.28May 18, 01:50 UTC
- TRADESELLNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 2.5$1.1KMay 18, 01:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nashville SC win on 2026-05-17?$319.31May 17, 22:42 UTC
- TRADESELLSan Francisco Giants vs. Athletics: O/U 9.5$318.81May 17, 22:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 2.5$623.08May 17, 21:30 UTC
- TRADESELLPhiladelphia Phillies vs. Pittsburgh Pirates: O/U 8.5$0.40May 17, 20:43 UTC
- TRADESELLPhiladelphia Phillies vs. Pittsburgh Pirates: O/U 8.5$623.98May 17, 20:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSan Francisco Giants vs. Athletics$106.12May 17, 19:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYSan Francisco Giants vs. Athletics: O/U 9.5$152.38May 17, 19:42 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami Marlins vs. Tampa Bay Rays$258.35May 17, 19:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYMilwaukee Brewers vs. Minnesota Twins$146.10May 17, 18:55 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-05-17?$146.32May 17, 18:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. New York Mets$59.90May 17, 18:01 UTC
- TRADESELLNew York Yankees vs. New York Mets$59.91May 17, 18:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. New York Mets$63.01May 17, 18:00 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami Marlins vs. Tampa Bay Rays: O/U 8.5$62.96May 17, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-05-17?$97.11May 17, 17:15 UTC
- TRADESELLWolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 2.5$69.61May 17, 15:41 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $202.72
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 23:27 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 02:18 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 10 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".