Jaded-Conflict
0x7ff2a5688f769d135c41a5a77c7512c9a0fa2be4
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
17
Open notional
$6.1K
Total PnL
$-2.3K
Realised
$-114.37
Win rate
50%
8 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 17- NO
Predict.fun FDV above $400M one day after launch?
6589 shares @ 59.5¢·now 44.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$2.9K
$-985.66
- YES
Will Predict.fun launch a token by September 30, 2026?
3048 shares @ 61.3¢·now 42.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$1.3K
$-573.61
- YES
OKX IPO in 2026?
4816 shares @ 14.9¢·now 10.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$505.66
$-211.80
- YES
Will Predict.fun launch a token by June 30, 2026?
4310 shares @ 18.6¢·now 8.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2028$366.38
$-433.88
- NO
Will Perena launch a token by September 30, 2026?
809 shares @ 39.8¢·now 38.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$307.25
$-14.23
- NO
Consensys IPO closing market cap above $3B?
273 shares @ 76.2¢·now 85.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$232.34
$23.95
- NO
Will Loopscale launch a token by June 30, 2026?
163 shares @ 76.6¢·now 90.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$146.77
$21.87
- NO
Consensys IPO closing market cap above $2B?
144 shares @ 43.1¢·now 84.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$121.66
$59.59
- YES
Will Exponent launch a token by December 31, 2026?
117 shares @ 26.7¢·now 48.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$56.89
$25.51
- NO
Will Exponent launch a token by June 30, 2026?
60 shares @ 80.5¢·now 87.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$52.22
$3.92
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by June 30, 2026?$22.96May 10, 10:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by June 30, 2026?$0.17May 10, 08:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by June 30, 2026?$0.87May 9, 04:57 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$1.08May 9, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by September 30, 2026?$141.00May 8, 17:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYProbable FDV above $500M one day after launch?$0.52May 8, 03:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by June 30, 2026?$0.30May 7, 12:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by September 30, 2026?$826.75May 6, 10:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Predict.fun launch a token by June 30, 2026?$126.88May 6, 10:19 UTC
- TRADESELLPredict.fun FDV above $300M one day after launch?$75.70May 4, 18:04 UTC
- TRADESELLPredict.fun FDV above $300M one day after launch?$2.00Apr 30, 13:58 UTC
- TRADESELLPredict.fun FDV above $300M one day after launch?$2.00Apr 30, 13:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $53.13
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 24, 09:35 UTC
- Last active
- May 10, 10:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 8 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".