0x880ca221cee10824d12f8639a5dabf90bec0cc6f
0x880ca221cee10824d12f8639a5dabf90bec0cc6f
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$1.8K
Total PnL
$-1.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $150,000 by December 31, 2026?
12160 shares @ 9.9¢·now 6.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$790.43
$-409.57
- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $40,000 by December 31, 2026?
3009 shares @ 39.9¢·now 23.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$707.03
$-492.97
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $250,000 by December 31, 2026?
12774 shares @ 4.5¢·now 2.6¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$338.52
$-240.54
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $250,000 by December 31, 2026?$579.07Mar 15, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $150,000 by December 31, 2026?$1.2KMar 15, 07:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $40,000 by December 31, 2026?$1.2KMar 15, 07:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $993.02
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 15, 07:16 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 15, 07:17 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".