Suspicious-Trapezoid
0x922cabda7c77841b200fa6651f93c5ae1882d099
Wallet digest
Activity score
56/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$32.80
Total PnL
$-147.20
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Italy replace Iran in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
911 shares @ 13.2¢·now 3.6¢·exp Aug 31, 2026$32.80
$-87.20
- YES
Fed increases interest rates by 25+ bps after January 2025 meeting?
2500 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Netanyahu out by March 31?
820 shares @ 6.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Italy replace Iran in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$123.13Apr 28, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNetanyahu out by March 31?$50.00Mar 15, 09:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYFed increases interest rates by 25+ bps after January 2025 meeting?$10.00Jan 29, 16:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $61.04
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 29, 16:23 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 28, 17:56 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".