Incomparable-Pincenez
0x97b35165c4efc6f3faaf7100559df23f6cb24a85
Wallet digest
Activity score
86/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
80
Open notional
$863.43
Total PnL
$-7.5K
Realised
$8.26
Win rate
80%
5 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 80- YES
Will Arsenal win the 2025–26 English Premier League?
535 shares @ 43.5¢·now 82.5¢·exp May 27, 2026$441.13
$208.53
- YES
Will Europe win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
373 shares @ 68.4¢·now 71.5¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$267.01
$11.58
- YES
Will England win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
800 shares @ 11.0¢·now 11.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$90.80
$2.41
- YES
AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: Both Teams to Score
100 shares @ 64.0¢·now 64.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$64.50
$0.50
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-05-17?
920 shares @ 38.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-351.79
- YES
Will Everton FC win on 2026-05-17?
740 shares @ 51.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-383.19
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-05-09?
700 shares @ 50.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-352.00
- YES
Will Girona FC win on 2026-05-14?
700 shares @ 47.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-331.99
- YES
Will Bayern München reach the UEFA Champions League final?
560 shares @ 53.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 7, 2026$0.00
$-299.05
- YES
FC Barcelona vs. Real Madrid CF: Both Teams to Score
460 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-317.38
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Olympique de Marseille win on 2026-05-17?$100.00May 18, 02:15 UTC
- REDEEMOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 2.5$202.56May 18, 02:11 UTC
- REDEEMParis FC vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: Both Teams to Score$77.57May 18, 02:01 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$11.73May 18, 00:45 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$199.99May 18, 00:32 UTC
- YIELD$0.01May 18, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: Both Teams to Score$28.44May 18, 00:01 UTC
- REDEEMReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Valencia CF: O/U 2.5$489.99May 17, 23:58 UTC
- REDEEMWill Levante UD win on 2026-05-17?$155.00May 17, 23:57 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elche CF win on 2026-05-17?$300.00May 17, 23:29 UTC
- REDEEMWill Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-05-17?$400.00May 17, 23:25 UTC
- REDEEMWill Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-05-17?$280.00May 17, 23:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$200.00May 17, 22:53 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Newcastle United FC (-1.5)$79.99May 17, 22:52 UTC
- REDEEMNewcastle United FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 2.5$699.96May 17, 22:52 UTC
- REDEEMSG Dynamo Dresden vs. Holstein Kiel: Both Teams to Score$99.98May 17, 19:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYRC Strasbourg Alsace vs. AS Monaco FC: O/U 3.5$61.10May 17, 18:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. US Lecce: O/U 2.5$106.00May 17, 18:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. US Lecce: O/U 2.5$108.00May 17, 18:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Valencia CF end in a draw?$4.97May 17, 18:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 26
- Avg trade size
- $32.45
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 14:03 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 02:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 5 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".