Snarling-Pantology
0x982a77e75498fa134607f598c861b8de9d0c6851
Wallet digest
Activity score
89/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
46
Open notional
$4.5K
Total PnL
$-51.89
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 46- NO
Will Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?
996 shares @ 91.1¢·now 90.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$896.37
$-11.26
- DOWN
S&P 500 (SPX) Opens Up or Down on May 18?
1000 shares @ 91.4¢·now 79.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$789.99
$-124.39
- DOWN
Dow Jones (DJIA) Up or Down on May 18?
850 shares @ 74.0¢·now 77.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$654.50
$25.50
- DOWN
S&P 500 (SPX) Up or Down on May 18?
874 shares @ 66.3¢·now 67.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$585.34
$6.12
- DOWN
SPY (SPY) Up or Down on May 18?
558 shares @ 71.1¢·now 66.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$368.43
$-28.66
- UP
NVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on May 18?
529 shares @ 63.1¢·now 67.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$354.24
$20.39
- DOWN
Meta (META) Up or Down on May 18?
242 shares @ 67.3¢·now 67.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$162.20
$-0.67
- DOWN
NVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on May 18?
450 shares @ 64.2¢·now 33.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$148.50
$-140.50
- YES
Will NVIDIA (NVDA) finish week of May 18 above $250?
497 shares @ 6.0¢·now 20.5¢·exp May 22, 2026$101.82
$72.05
- NO
Will Google (GOOGL) finish week of May 18 above $380?
510 shares @ 9.0¢·now 18.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$91.80
$45.90
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on May 18?$8.39May 18, 09:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYNVIDIA (NVDA) Up or Down on May 18?$66.00May 18, 09:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$27.29May 18, 09:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYS&P 500 (SPX) Up or Down on May 18?$64.00May 18, 09:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$38.10May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$46.21May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$6.68May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$39.83May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$51.16May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$44.48May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYS&P 500 (SPX) Up or Down on May 18?$40.79May 18, 09:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$46.51May 18, 09:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$44.99May 18, 09:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$46.01May 18, 09:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$45.90May 18, 09:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$45.10May 18, 09:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $630 on May 18?$46.01May 18, 09:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Meta (META) close above $600 on May 18?$7.80May 18, 09:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYMeta (META) Up or Down on May 18?$67.88May 18, 09:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill NVIDIA (NVDA) finish week of May 18 above $250?$6.60May 18, 09:08 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $34.13
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 08:26 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 09:36 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".