Weird-Wire
0x9f57b2cdbc002d3e05075b1d36f8c9967d72c930
Wallet digest
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$7.4K
Total PnL
$-1.6K
Realised
$102.28
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- YIELD$0.82May 18, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.84May 17, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.84May 16, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.84May 15, 00:14 UTC
- YIELD$0.87May 14, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.88May 13, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.88May 12, 00:16 UTC
- YIELD$0.95May 11, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.94May 10, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.94May 9, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.97May 8, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.98May 7, 00:14 UTC
- YIELD$0.96May 6, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.97May 5, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.61May 4, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.69May 3, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.63May 2, 00:11 UTC
- YIELD$0.97May 1, 00:10 UTC
- YIELD$0.86Apr 30, 00:10 UTC
- YIELD$1.78Apr 29, 00:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 2
- Avg trade size
- $310.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 1, 00:15 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 00:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".