Shimmering-Information
0xadd4a0480322b300b1fd618ff7d72ebd4b6696ed
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
31
Open notional
$37.81
Total PnL
$-111.19
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 31- UNDER
Paris FC vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC: O/U 3.5
9 shares @ 54.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$9.26
$4.26
- UNDER
Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 3.5
10 shares @ 49.0¢·now 53.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$5.46
$0.46
- UNDER
Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 2.5
18 shares @ 28.0¢·now 29.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$5.27
$0.27
- UNDER
Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 3.5
8 shares @ 63.0¢·now 62.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$4.96
$-0.04
- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5
8 shares @ 60.0¢·now 59.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$4.96
$-0.04
- UNDER
AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 3.5
5 shares @ 57.0¢·now 55.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$2.92
$-0.08
- UNDER
AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5
9 shares @ 35.0¢·now 33.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$2.87
$-0.13
- YES
Will Spain win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
5 shares @ 19.0¢·now 16.7¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$0.88
$-0.12
- YES
Will Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
10 shares @ 10.0¢·now 8.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$0.83
$-0.16
- YES
Will Norway win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
18 shares @ 5.6¢·now 2.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$0.40
$-0.60
Recent activity
- REDEEMReal Sociedad de Fútbol vs. Valencia CF: O/U 2.5$9.80May 18, 01:03 UTC
- REDEEMEverton FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 2.5$9.80May 18, 01:03 UTC
- REDEEMRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Villarreal CF: O/U 2.5$11.11May 18, 01:03 UTC
- REDEEMCA Osasuna vs. RCD Espanyol de Barcelona: O/U 2.5$12.50May 18, 01:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 3.5$5.06May 17, 14:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5$5.06May 17, 14:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 3.5$3.04May 17, 14:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$3.06May 17, 14:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 3.5$5.08May 17, 14:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 2.5$5.11May 17, 14:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYNewcastle United FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 2.5$3.06May 17, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 2.5$5.07May 17, 14:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 2.5$5.08May 17, 14:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYEverton FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 2.5$5.07May 17, 14:05 UTC
- REDEEMBayer 04 Leverkusen vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 3.5$11.11May 17, 14:04 UTC
- REDEEMBayer 04 Leverkusen vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 2.5$20.00May 17, 14:04 UTC
- REDEEMSV Werder Bremen vs. BV Borussia 09 Dortmund: O/U 2.5$25.22May 17, 14:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYSevilla FC vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5$5.07May 17, 14:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYCA Osasuna vs. RCD Espanyol de Barcelona: O/U 3.5$5.12May 17, 14:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYCA Osasuna vs. RCD Espanyol de Barcelona: O/U 2.5$5.09May 17, 14:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 36
- Avg trade size
- $4.92
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 14, 00:58 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 01:03 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".