Tart-Descent
0xbe03c2e16256a056b533e5d392ab68419e5a394d
Wallet digest
Activity score
92/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$1.2K
Total PnL
$158.74
Realised
$-0.05
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADESELLNatural Disaster in 2026?$2.70Feb 22, 08:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYNatural Disaster in 2026?$774.44Jan 3, 12:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYNatural Disaster in 2026?$108.48Jan 3, 12:17 UTC
- REDEEMWho will win Jake Paul vs Anthony Joshua?$882.92Jan 3, 10:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWho will win Jake Paul vs Anthony Joshua?$768.14Dec 20, 02:38 UTC
- TRADESELLNuclear weapon detonation in 2025?$768.14Dec 20, 02:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYNuclear weapon detonation in 2025?$225.22Oct 30, 02:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYNuclear weapon detonation in 2025?$425.88Oct 30, 02:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYNothing Ever Happens: Military Edition$171.37Oct 30, 02:18 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 8
- Avg trade size
- $405.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 30, 02:18 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 22, 08:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".