Luminous-Morphology
0xbed3ae1f0128e01caf3b9cffb8a0c2da3b562811
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
14
Open notional
$4.5K
Total PnL
$-35.6K
Realised
$-3.6K
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 14- YES
Will Ethereum dip to $2,000 in May?
8187 shares @ 59.4¢·now 54.5¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$4.5K
$-400.52
- MIBR
Valorant: MIBR vs Cloud9 (BO3) - VCT Americas Stage 1 Group Alpha
8578 shares @ 57.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 27, 2026$0.00
$-4.9K
- YES
Borussia Mönchengladbach vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: Both Teams to Score
7039 shares @ 68.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-4.8K
- UNDER
Thunder vs. Lakers: O/U 214.5
6144 shares @ 75.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-4.6K
- UNDER
Aston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 4.5
5399 shares @ 88.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-4.8K
- YES
Will FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-02?
3927 shares @ 78.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-3.1K
- UNDER
Sporting CP vs. CD Tondela: O/U 2.5
3309 shares @ 30.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-1000.00
- UNDER
CF Cruz Azul vs. Club Necaxa: O/U 2.5
2447 shares @ 73.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 27, 2026$0.00
$-1.8K
- UNDER
RC Celta de Vigo vs. Levante UD: O/U 4.5
2316 shares @ 86.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- UNDER
Atlanta United FC vs. Los Angeles Galaxy: O/U 2.5
1674 shares @ 90.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-1.5K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,000 in May?$4.11May 18, 01:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,000 in May?$882.99May 18, 01:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $2,000 in May?$4.1KMay 18, 01:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBorussia Mönchengladbach vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: Both Teams to Score$815.63May 16, 07:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYBorussia Mönchengladbach vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: Both Teams to Score$2.0KMay 16, 07:15 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-16?$2.8KMay 16, 07:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-16?$195.57May 16, 07:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYBorussia Mönchengladbach vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: Both Teams to Score$2.0KMay 16, 07:02 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Mito Holly Hock vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5$479.51May 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Mito Holly Hock vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5$314.15May 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Mito Holly Hock vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5$509.47May 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Mito Holly Hock vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5$330.66May 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADESELLFC Mito Holly Hock vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5$580.45May 16, 07:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Mito Holly Hock vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5$2.0KMay 16, 06:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Bayern München win on 2026-05-16?$2.7KMay 16, 05:19 UTC
- TRADESELLToronto Tempo vs. Los Angeles Sparks$3.5KMay 16, 04:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYToronto Tempo vs. Los Angeles Sparks$3.1KMay 16, 02:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYToronto Tempo vs. Los Angeles Sparks$3.01May 16, 02:58 UTC
- TRADESELLSpurs vs. Timberwolves$3.1KMay 16, 02:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpurs vs. Timberwolves$3.03May 15, 22:08 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $1.2K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 04:15 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 01:44 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".