Rubbery-Llama
0xd871d5ecfe28003385c62ef1d89bca62db566bba
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-121.8K
Realised
$-226.63
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- OVER
CA Vélez Sarsfield vs. CA River Plate: O/U 1.5
17460 shares @ 60.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-10.5K
- OVER
CD Guadalajara vs. CF Cruz Azul: O/U 3.5
7812 shares @ 49.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-3.9K
- OVER
Los Angeles Galaxy vs. Charlotte FC: O/U 3.5
4733 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 1, 2026$0.00
$-2.8K
- OVER
FC Internazionale Milano vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: O/U 3.5
3900 shares @ 66.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-2.6K
- OVER
USL Dunkerque vs. Stade Lavallois Mayenne FC: O/U 2.5
3310 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 20, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- OVER
Magic vs. Pistons: O/U 218.5
3304 shares @ 48.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- OVER
Manchester City FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 3.5
3283 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
- OVER
Seattle Sounders FC vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 2.5
3169 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 23, 2026$0.00
$-31.69
- OVER
Al Ahli Saudi Club vs. Al Kholood Saudi Club: O/U 4.5
3148 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-1.7K
- OVER
Real Oviedo vs. Club Atlético de Madrid: O/U 1.5
3030 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 28, 2026$0.00
$-1.8K
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$131.47May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$2.05May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$34.75May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$34.75May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$77.08May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$29.20May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$63.96May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$0.99May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$108.24May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$95.94May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$74.21May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$2.27May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$4.12May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$227.14May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$12.30May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$21.73May 18, 02:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$2.05May 18, 02:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$17.73May 18, 02:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$31.71May 18, 02:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYPumas de la UNAM vs. CF Pachuca: O/U 1.5$2.05May 18, 02:49 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $373.34
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 23:02 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 02:50 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".