Composed-Worker
0xeb0ee9cc5a5142bd46a2fd5cdaf1c8487ee3abad
Wallet digest
Activity score
51/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$5.36
Total PnL
$-8.37
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Partido Popular (PP) win the 2026 Castilla y León Regional Election?$0.00Apr 9, 06:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $1,800 in April?$4.31Apr 9, 06:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Democratic Party win the CA-16 House seat?$5.00Apr 9, 06:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $1,600 in April?$5.00Apr 9, 06:55 UTC
- REDEEMWill Qatar strike Iran by March 31?$0.00Apr 9, 06:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Partido Popular (PP) win the 2026 Castilla y León Regional Election?$34.00Mar 8, 14:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Qatar strike Iran by March 31?$162.52Mar 3, 17:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $42.17
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 3, 17:01 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 9, 06:58 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".