Periodic-Exwife
0x02a7f27cda39936b0c3d9c4dace0266d239475e2
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
7
Open notional
$2.3K
Total PnL
$-429.91
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- LEGACY
Counter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner
1010 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$1.0K
$9.60
- LEGACY
Counter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A
1001 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$1.0K
$0.50
- BIG ACADEMY
Counter-Strike: Kinoa vs BIG Academy (BO3) - European Pro League Regular Playoffs
101 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$100.96
$0.96
- BIG ACADEMY
Counter-Strike: Kinoa vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner
101 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$100.96
$0.96
- EX-RUBY
Counter-Strike: ex-RUBY vs HOTU - Map 1 Winner
101 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$100.96
$0.96
- WIZARDS
76ers vs. Wizards
363 shares @ 91.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 28, 2025$0.00
$-333.07
- NO
Will the highest temperature in Hong Kong be 29°C on April 23?
110 shares @ 99.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-109.82
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group A$1000.00May 20, 14:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$649.03May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$29.85May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$1.54May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$1.77May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$198.00May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$118.83May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Legacy vs TYLOO - Map 2 Winner$1.01May 20, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Kinoa vs BIG Academy - Map 2 Winner$100.00May 20, 12:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Kinoa vs BIG Academy (BO3) - European Pro League Regular Playoffs$100.03May 20, 12:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: ex-RUBY vs HOTU - Map 1 Winner$100.03May 20, 11:38 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: TheMongolz vs B8 - Map 1 Winner$1.0KMay 20, 11:26 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MIBR vs PARIVISION - Map 1 Winner$1.0KMay 20, 11:23 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Falcons Force - Map 1 Winner$87.00May 20, 11:12 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: paiN vs M80 (BO1) - CS Asia Championships Group A$1.0KMay 20, 09:59 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Legacy vs NRG (BO1) - CS Asia Championships Group A$10.10May 20, 08:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: TheMongolz vs B8 - Map 1 Winner$801.32May 20, 08:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs PARIVISION - Map 1 Winner$815.53May 20, 08:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MIBR vs PARIVISION - Map 1 Winner$184.47May 20, 08:45 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MOUZ vs TYLOO (BO1) - CS Asia Championships Group A$10.10May 20, 08:39 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 33
- Avg trade size
- $184.07
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 18, 03:16 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 14:16 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".