0x05b89d8b0a735c76c4c2335cffe329d292ef408c
0x05b89d8b0a735c76c4c2335cffe329d292ef408c
Wallet digest
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
15
Open notional
$48.35
Total PnL
$-17.75
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- UNDER
Grêmio FBPA vs. Santos FC: O/U 2.5
21 shares @ 56.0¢·now 55.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$11.89
$-0.11
- NO
Hull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: Both Teams to Score
8 shares @ 74.1¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$8.09
$2.09
- NO
Will Hull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC end in a draw?
5 shares @ 59.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$5.08
$2.08
- UNDER
Hull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 1.5
5 shares @ 64.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$4.69
$1.69
- UNDER
Hull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 2.5
4 shares @ 76.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.95
$0.95
- NO
Hull City AFC leading at halftime?
3 shares @ 91.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.29
$0.29
- UNDER
RC Celta de Vigo vs. Sevilla FC: O/U 3.5
4 shares @ 74.0¢·now 74.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.02
$0.02
- HNK RIJEKA
Spread: HNK Gorica (-2.5)
3 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.00
$0.00
- UNDER
Mirassol FC vs. Fluminense FC: O/U 2.5
5 shares @ 61.0¢·now 59.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$2.93
$-0.07
- VALENCIA CF
Spread: FC Barcelona (-1.5)
3 shares @ 74.0¢·now 72.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$2.37
$-0.05
Recent activity
- REDEEMCeltic FC vs. Dunfermline Athletic FC: Both Teams to Score$0.00May 23, 17:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Middlesbrough FC win on 2026-05-23?$16.34May 23, 17:43 UTC
- TRADESELLBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 3.5$18.16May 23, 17:42 UTC
- REDEEMBeijing Guoan FC vs. Henan FC: O/U 2.5$5.00May 23, 17:41 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Beijing Guoan FC (-1.5)$0.00May 23, 17:39 UTC
- REDEEMBeijing Guoan FC vs. Henan FC: O/U 1.5$0.00May 23, 17:37 UTC
- REDEEMDalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: Draw at halftime?$0.00May 23, 16:57 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Championships: Denmark vs. Slovenia$4.23May 23, 16:33 UTC
- REDEEMWill Dalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC end in a draw?$4.11May 23, 16:11 UTC
- REDEEMDalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 1.5$7.14May 23, 16:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill Dalian Yingbo FC win on 2026-05-23?$0.00May 23, 16:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Zlín vs. 1. FC Slovácko end in a draw?$0.00May 23, 15:59 UTC
- REDEEMSK Sigma Olomouc vs. MFK Karviná: O/U 2.5$0.00May 23, 15:55 UTC
- REDEEMWill Kyōto Sanga FC win on 2026-05-23?$0.01May 23, 15:49 UTC
- TRADESELLShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 3.5$5.79May 23, 15:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: Both Teams to Score$2.04May 23, 15:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: Both Teams to Score$3.02May 23, 15:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC end in a draw?$3.04May 23, 15:28 UTC
- TRADESELLShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$8.09May 23, 15:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: FC Barcelona (-1.5)$2.44May 23, 15:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $4.92
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 15:03 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 17:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".