Definitive-Respite
0x13ad24ac76fb068df0bbbe16821d405a1bec241b
Wallet digest
Activity score
84/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
37
Open notional
$61.16
Total PnL
$-2.1K
Realised
$372.70
Win rate
90%
10 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 37- NO
Will Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?
81 shares @ 75.0¢·now 75.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$61.16
$0.41
- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-04-22?
1271 shares @ 7.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-99.85
- YES
Will RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-04-22?
831 shares @ 8.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-72.17
- YES
Will Deportivo Alavés win on 2026-04-21?
718 shares @ 7.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 21, 2026$0.00
$-55.59
- YES
Will US Cremonese win on 2026-04-24?
568 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 24, 2026$0.00
$-45.41
- YES
Will Torino FC win on 2026-04-26?
563 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-61.95
- YES
Will AJ Auxerre win on 2026-04-25?
550 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-87.98
- YES
Will Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-05-03?
456 shares @ 20.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-91.10
- YES
Will Getafe CF win on 2026-04-25?
419 shares @ 16.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-66.97
- YES
Will FC Metz win on 2026-04-26?
417 shares @ 18.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-76.10
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?$3.75May 18, 18:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?$45.00May 18, 18:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?$6.00May 18, 16:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?$3.00May 18, 12:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Fulham FC vs. Newcastle United FC end in a draw?$3.00May 18, 10:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$5.18May 16, 18:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$26.10May 16, 18:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$1.76May 16, 18:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$4.32May 16, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.22May 16, 17:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.95May 16, 16:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.91May 16, 16:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$1.08May 16, 16:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.90May 16, 16:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$10.98May 16, 16:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.22May 16, 16:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.95May 16, 14:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-05-17?$36.00May 15, 13:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.27May 15, 13:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-05-17?$0.27May 15, 13:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 37
- Avg trade size
- $6.03
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 6, 16:18 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 18:18 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 10 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".