Deficient-Alias
0x140e74fd05b60d5e983155bd92b91215aaa9cf85
Wallet digest
Activity score
61/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
15
Open notional
$60.00
Total PnL
$-255.97
Realised
$-1.18
Win rate
33%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- UNDER
Avispa Fukuoka vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 2.5
100 shares @ 62.0¢·now 60.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$60.00
$-2.00
- OVER
US Lecce vs. Juventus FC: O/U 1.5
125 shares @ 82.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-102.85
- UNDER
V-Varen Nagasaki vs. Fagiano Okayama: O/U 2.5
101 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-60.68
- UNDER
Manchester United FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 3.5
50 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-30.00
- UNDER
1. FC Nürnberg vs. FC Schalke 04: O/U 2.5
20 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 9, 2026$0.00
$-8.15
- OVER
Yunnan Yukun FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 2.5
20 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-10.20
- OVER
Urawa Red Diamonds vs. FC Tōkyō: O/U 1.5
20 shares @ 54.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-10.90
- OVER
Avispa Fukuoka vs. Kyōto Sanga FC: O/U 2.5
12 shares @ 32.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- OVER
Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 2.5
11 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-3.56
- OVER
Kawasaki Frontale vs. Tōkyō Verdy: O/U 2.5
10 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-1.98
Recent activity
- TRADESELLSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 2.5$50.09May 23, 05:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYAvispa Fukuoka vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 2.5$62.71May 23, 05:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 2.5$41.71May 23, 05:02 UTC
- TRADESELLACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 2.5$47.25May 22, 19:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 2.5$41.73May 22, 18:46 UTC
- REDEEMFC Machida Zelvia vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: O/U 2.5$100.00May 22, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Machida Zelvia vs. Urawa Red Diamonds: O/U 2.5$63.70May 22, 10:15 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$68.36May 21, 18:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$51.75May 21, 18:32 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$58.43May 21, 18:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$53.75May 21, 17:31 UTC
- TRADESELLBrøndby IF vs. FC København: O/U 2.5$21.29May 21, 17:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrøndby IF vs. FC København: O/U 2.5$3.06May 21, 17:05 UTC
- TRADESELLAFC Ajax vs. FC Groningen: O/U 2.5$50.25May 21, 17:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrøndby IF vs. FC København: O/U 2.5$46.75May 21, 16:47 UTC
- TRADESELLBrøndby IF vs. FC København: O/U 2.5$51.25May 21, 16:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Ajax vs. FC Groningen: O/U 2.5$42.73May 21, 16:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrøndby IF vs. FC København: O/U 2.5$48.75May 21, 16:06 UTC
- REDEEMCusco FC vs. Independiente Medellín: O/U 2.5$71.64May 21, 16:02 UTC
- TRADESELLCusco FC vs. Independiente Medellín: O/U 2.5$34.32May 21, 02:30 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $53.41
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 18:09 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 05:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".