Frilly-Badge
0x1a2c17155510362fa79c906cbc105127a1e969d4
Wallet digest
Activity score
69/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$86.00
Total PnL
$-423.89
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Peru General Election invalidated by June 30?
2987 shares @ 0.9¢·now 2.4¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$71.68
$44.80
- YES
Will Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?
2148 shares @ 20.6¢·now 0.7¢·exp Jun 7, 2026$13.96
$-428.29
- YES
Will Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?
721 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.36
$-35.40
- YES
Will Rafael López Aliaga and Alfonso López Chau advance to the runoff?
185 shares @ 2.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYPeru General Election invalidated by June 30?$27.95May 6, 02:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$101.50Apr 19, 09:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$22.00Apr 13, 07:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.14Apr 13, 07:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.07Apr 13, 06:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.07Apr 13, 06:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.09Apr 13, 06:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.29Apr 13, 06:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.09Apr 13, 06:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$0.26Apr 13, 06:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$21.00Apr 6, 12:27 UTC
- REDEEMMaduro out in 2025?$0.00Apr 3, 01:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill Yulia Navalnaya win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2025?$0.00Apr 2, 11:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Renovación Popular (RP) win the most seats in the 2026 Peruvian Senate election?$12.75Apr 1, 05:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rafael López Aliaga and Alfonso López Chau advance to the runoff?$5.00Apr 1, 05:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$186.00Apr 1, 05:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$28.64Mar 14, 00:23 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Wolfgang Grozo win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$1.77Mar 9, 20:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Wolfgang Grozo win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$1.33Mar 9, 19:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rafael López Aliaga win the 2026 Peruvian presidential election?$11.56Mar 9, 18:57 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $16.67
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 26, 16:04 UTC
- Last active
- May 6, 02:27 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".