Multicolored-Holder
0x2104c998fdff28892628205c543d7604b9aa82d7
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
29
Open notional
$372.33
Total PnL
$-2.6K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 29- NO
Will FC Groningen win on 2026-05-21?
392 shares @ 76.6¢·now 95.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$372.33
$72.08
- NO
Will Samsunspor win on 2026-04-19?
296 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-216.23
- UNDER
Everton FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 4.5
295 shares @ 92.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-272.00
- UNDER
AC Milan vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 4.5
238 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-142.82
- UNDER
Parma Calcio 1913 vs. AS Roma: O/U 4.5
230 shares @ 87.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- YES
FC Barcelona vs. RC Celta de Vigo: Both Teams to Score
205 shares @ 55.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-114.46
- UNDER
SS Lazio vs. Udinese Calcio: O/U 4.5
205 shares @ 97.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 27, 2026$0.00
$-198.82
- FENERBAHCE
Zalgiris Kaunas vs. Fenerbahce
205 shares @ 48.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- NO
Will 1. FSV Mainz 05 win on 2026-05-16?
192 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5
166 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-106.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill FC Groningen win on 2026-05-21?$302.36May 21, 16:04 UTC
- TRADESELLSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 5.5$462.96May 20, 21:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 5.5$431.91May 20, 20:21 UTC
- TRADESELLSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5$432.20May 20, 20:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5$329.99May 20, 20:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 2.5$107.14May 19, 17:53 UTC
- REDEEMFC Lorient vs. Le Havre AC: O/U 4.5$215.36May 18, 02:17 UTC
- REDEEMOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 5.5$255.13May 18, 02:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill US Sassuolo Calcio win on 2026-05-17?$107.53May 18, 01:43 UTC
- REDEEMWill Torino FC win on 2026-05-17?$105.26May 18, 01:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Lorient vs. Le Havre AC: O/U 4.5$100.21May 17, 20:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Lorient vs. Le Havre AC: O/U 4.5$100.21May 17, 20:24 UTC
- TRADESELLRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Villarreal CF: O/U 4.5$107.41May 17, 20:23 UTC
- TRADESELLWill BK Hacken win on 2026-05-17?$115.43May 17, 20:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 5.5$99.65May 17, 20:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 5.5$100.66May 17, 20:19 UTC
- TRADESELLNewcastle United FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 4.5$140.69May 17, 20:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Sassuolo Calcio win on 2026-05-17?$100.21May 17, 20:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Torino FC win on 2026-05-17?$100.15May 17, 19:55 UTC
- REDEEMKayserispor vs. Konyaspor: O/U 4.5$161.63May 17, 19:40 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 40
- Avg trade size
- $153.76
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 15:44 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 16:04 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".