0x27de01e3e3497de3be992a6bf56498148a1e9b6a
0x27de01e3e3497de3be992a6bf56498148a1e9b6a
Wallet digest
Activity score
97/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
9
Open notional
$49.04
Total PnL
$13.04
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Exact Score: NEOM SC 1 - 1 Al Ettifaq Saudi Club?
33 shares @ 12.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$33.33
$29.33
- YES
Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club leading at halftime?
16 shares @ 38.0¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 21, 2026$15.70
$9.70
- YES
Exact Score: Al Riyadh Saudi Club 2 - 2 Al Okhdood SC?
60 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Exact Score: Al Hazem SC 1 - 3 Al Taawoun Saudi Club?
50 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- YES
Exact Score: Al Nassr Saudi Club 2 - 1 Damac Saudi Club?
44 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- YES
Exact Score: Al Fayha Saudi Club 1 - 3 Al Hilal Saudi Club?
30 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Al Okhdood SC leading at halftime?
29 shares @ 14.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- YES
Al Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: Draw at halftime?
15 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
- YES
NEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: Draw at halftime?
10 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 21, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYExact Score: NEOM SC 1 - 1 Al Ettifaq Saudi Club?$4.13May 21, 18:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: Draw at halftime?$4.09May 21, 18:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Okhdood SC leading at halftime?$4.12May 21, 18:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Al Hazem SC 1 - 3 Al Taawoun Saudi Club?$4.13May 21, 17:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club leading at halftime?$6.14May 21, 17:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: Draw at halftime?$4.11May 21, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Al Fayha Saudi Club 1 - 3 Al Hilal Saudi Club?$3.10May 21, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Al Riyadh Saudi Club 2 - 2 Al Okhdood SC?$3.10May 21, 17:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Al Nassr Saudi Club 2 - 1 Damac Saudi Club?$4.13May 21, 17:50 UTC
- REDEEMSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 2.5$10.00May 21, 06:23 UTC
- REDEEMSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$0.00May 21, 06:23 UTC
- REDEEMSC Freiburg leading at halftime?$0.00May 21, 06:23 UTC
- REDEEMAl Khaleej Saudi Club leading at halftime?$0.00May 21, 06:23 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Al Khaleej Saudi Club 1 - 2 Al Ahli Saudi Club?$0.00May 21, 06:23 UTC
- REDEEMAl Najmah Saudi Club vs. Al Shabab Saudi Club: O/U 1.5$26.31May 21, 06:23 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: SC Freiburg 1 - 2 Aston Villa FC?$0.00May 21, 06:22 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Al Najmah Saudi Club 1 - 1 Al Shabab Saudi Club?$0.00May 21, 06:22 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Al Khaleej Saudi Club 0 - 0 Al Ahli Saudi Club?$0.00May 21, 06:22 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: Al Najmah Saudi Club 0 - 0 Al Shabab Saudi Club?$0.00May 21, 06:22 UTC
- REDEEMExact Score: SC Freiburg 2 - 3 Aston Villa FC?$0.00May 21, 06:22 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 27
- Avg trade size
- $4.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 18, 18:57 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 18:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".