Vivacious-Zinc
0x3350a0bc2496d57ad2187c3e5fdc91879e5c9588
Wallet digest
Activity score
71/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
17
Open notional
$120.27
Total PnL
$-640.69
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 17- UNDER
Hull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5
121 shares @ 91.0¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$120.27
$10.27
- YES
Will Villarreal CF win on 2026-05-13?
143 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-70.00
- YES
Will Athletic Club win on 2026-05-10?
103 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-60.00
- MAGIC
Pistons vs. Magic
98 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- YES
Will UD Almería win on 2026-05-16?
93 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- CAVALIERS
Cavaliers vs. Raptors
81 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- LAKERS
Rockets vs. Lakers
81 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- UNDER
Getafe CF vs. RCD Mallorca: O/U 3.5
76 shares @ 85.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-65.00
- YES
Leeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: Both Teams to Score
66 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- OVER
FC Barcelona vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 2.5
64 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-47.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$110.30May 23, 06:30 UTC
- REDEEMACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$115.79May 22, 22:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$110.16May 22, 04:58 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: SC Heerenveen (-1.5)$76.92May 21, 22:31 UTC
- REDEEMFC Utrecht vs. SC Heerenveen: O/U 0.5$104.17May 21, 22:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: SC Heerenveen (-1.5)$70.19May 21, 11:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Utrecht vs. SC Heerenveen: O/U 0.5$100.12May 21, 11:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill Christine Drazan win the 2026 Oregon Governor Republican primary election?$131.58May 20, 07:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: Both Teams to Score$25.38May 20, 04:25 UTC
- REDEEMChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 5.5$161.29May 19, 22:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 5.5$150.31May 19, 04:42 UTC
- REDEEMWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-18?$219.78May 18, 22:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-18?$200.54May 18, 04:28 UTC
- REDEEMOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: Both Teams to Score$112.68May 18, 02:13 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Brighton & Hove Albion FC (-2.5)$87.91May 17, 19:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYOlympique de Marseille vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: Both Teams to Score$80.70May 17, 18:09 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Juventus FC (-2.5)$41.10May 17, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMManchester United FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: Both Teams to Score$50.85May 17, 15:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Brighton & Hove Albion FC (-2.5)$80.22May 17, 04:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: Both Teams to Score$40.47May 17, 04:10 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 30
- Avg trade size
- $59.62
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 13, 04:26 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 06:30 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".