Pricey-Crab
0x3ab49e24614a2b2bc02c8eb1df0046d77e6e4c4e
Wallet digest
Activity score
58/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$5.82
Total PnL
$-10.68
Realised
$-0.50
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?
3 shares @ 59.0¢·now 60.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$2.05
$0.05
- YES
Exact Score: AFC Bournemouth 2 - 1 Manchester City FC?
33 shares @ 6.0¢·now 5.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$1.83
$-0.17
- YES
Will Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC end in a draw?
4 shares @ 26.0¢·now 25.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.98
$-0.02
- YES
Exact Score: Chelsea FC 2 - 1 Tottenham Hotspur FC?
9 shares @ 11.0¢·now 10.5¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.95
$-0.05
- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?
33 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Exact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 0 Burnley FC?
13 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will Crystal Palace FC win on 2026-05-17?
9 shares @ 22.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will Manchester United FC vs. Nottingham Forest FC end in a draw?
9 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will West Ham United FC win on 2026-05-17?
7 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will Sevilla FC vs. Real Madrid CF end in a draw?
5 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Chelsea FC 2 - 1 Tottenham Hotspur FC?$1.03May 19, 07:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC end in a draw?$1.02May 19, 07:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: AFC Bournemouth 2 - 1 Manchester City FC?$2.06May 19, 07:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?$2.02May 19, 07:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?$1.03May 18, 05:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 0 Burnley FC?$2.05May 18, 04:48 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 0 Burnley FC?$3.41May 18, 04:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 0 Burnley FC?$2.05May 18, 03:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 0 Burnley FC?$2.05May 18, 03:40 UTC
- TRADESELLRaphinha: Anytime Goalscorer$4.08May 18, 02:08 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: FC Barcelona 3 - 1 Real Betis Balompié?$18.84May 18, 02:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-05-17?$4.11May 18, 02:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYRaphinha: Anytime Goalscorer$2.03May 17, 19:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Barcelona 3 - 1 Real Betis Balompié?$2.05May 17, 19:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-05-17?$3.02May 17, 17:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Sevilla FC vs. Real Madrid CF end in a draw?$1.02May 17, 17:43 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-05-17?$4.95May 17, 17:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF win on 2026-05-17?$5.05May 17, 17:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill West Ham United FC win on 2026-05-17?$2.04May 17, 16:27 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-24?$1.51May 17, 16:11 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 27
- Avg trade size
- $3.14
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 12:50 UTC
- Last active
- May 19, 07:26 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".