Important-Timer
0x3c33c9ecbf23f0b42b80939ad87b234e3659ddd4
Wallet digest
Activity score
56/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
46
Open notional
$3.13
Total PnL
$-167.87
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 46- YES
Exact Score: Getafe CF 1 - 1 CA Osasuna?
6 shares @ 16.0¢·now 50.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$3.13
$2.13
- YES
Will SE Palmeiras win on 2026-05-16?
27 shares @ 54.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Al Fateh Saudi Club vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club end in a draw?
24 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Al Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club end in a draw?
20 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Casa Pia AC win on 2026-05-16?
19 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Villarreal CF vs. Sevilla FC end in a draw?
18 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Athletic Club win on 2026-05-17?
17 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
Will FC Machida Zelvia win on 2026-05-13?
16 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-8.00
- MOLDE FK
Spread: Molde FK (-1.5)
15 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
Will FC Rapid 1923 win on 2026-05-15?
14 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.00
$-6.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 2.5$5.26May 23, 19:28 UTC
- REDEEMHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 2.5$4.48May 23, 18:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Getafe CF 1 - 1 CA Osasuna?$1.03May 23, 17:08 UTC
- REDEEMShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$8.51May 23, 17:04 UTC
- REDEEMDalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 2.5$8.33May 23, 16:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYBologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano: O/U 2.5$3.04May 23, 16:00 UTC
- REDEEMKyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 2.5$8.16May 23, 15:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYHull City AFC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 2.5$3.03May 23, 14:44 UTC
- REDEEMKashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō: O/U 2.5$4.84May 23, 14:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYDalian Yingbo FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 2.5$4.06May 23, 11:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 2.5$4.06May 23, 10:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYKyōto Sanga FC vs. V-Varen Nagasaki: O/U 2.5$4.06May 23, 09:55 UTC
- REDEEMAvispa Fukuoka vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 2.5$4.84May 23, 09:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYKashima Antlers vs. FC Tōkyō: O/U 2.5$3.03May 23, 08:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYAvispa Fukuoka vs. Vissel Kōbe: O/U 2.5$3.03May 23, 05:06 UTC
- REDEEMFC Utrecht vs. SC Heerenveen: O/U 2.5$1.64May 21, 22:30 UTC
- REDEEMAl Nassr Saudi Club vs. Damac Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$2.13May 21, 21:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill AFC Ajax win on 2026-05-21?$7.69May 21, 20:08 UTC
- REDEEMWill Mohun Bagan Super Giant win on 2026-05-21?$5.00May 21, 19:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Utrecht vs. SC Heerenveen: O/U 2.5$1.01May 21, 17:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $2.37
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 19:03 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 19:28 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".