Negligible-Certification
0x3e73934b881659aa25a4f08bc8ab9067295bc4ec
Wallet digest
Activity score
90/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$64.0K
Total PnL
$175.13
Realised
$183.58
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will OGC Nice win on 2026-05-22?
52333 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$52.3K
$52.33
- OVER
Racing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5
4009 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$4.0K
$40.09
- OVER
ACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5
3918 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$3.9K
$3.92
- OVER
Racing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 2.5
1508 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$1.5K
$15.08
- YES
FC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești: Both Teams to Score
1415 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$1.4K
$14.23
- YES
Racing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: Both Teams to Score
803 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 22, 2026$802.64
$8.03
- UNDER
Club Always Ready vs. Mirassol FC: O/U 2.5
1261 shares @ 1.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-21.07
- UNDER
Independiente Santa Fe vs. CA Platense: O/U 1.5
1000 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- UNDER
Fluminense FC vs. Club Bolívar: O/U 2.5
625 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-6.25
- OVER
CA Rosario Central vs. Universidad Central de Venezuela FC: O/U 4.5
100 shares @ 95.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-94.81
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill OGC Nice win on 2026-05-22?$19.0KMay 22, 21:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill OGC Nice win on 2026-05-22?$33.3KMay 22, 21:35 UTC
- REDEEMFC CFR 1907 Cluj vs. FC Argeș Pitești: O/U 1.5$3.6KMay 22, 21:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$23.44May 22, 20:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$20.94May 22, 20:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$30.94May 22, 20:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$607.29May 22, 20:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$112.86May 22, 20:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$136.62May 22, 20:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$191.55May 22, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$0.54May 22, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$58.23May 22, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$0.22May 22, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: O/U 3.5$2.8KMay 22, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$51.56May 22, 20:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$2.2KMay 22, 20:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$606.39May 22, 20:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$59.94May 22, 20:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. OGC Nice: Both Teams to Score$5.82May 22, 20:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. Atalanta BC: O/U 0.5$999.00May 22, 20:01 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentLedger volume
$9.4K
Trades
1
Buy share
100%
Window
May 17, 12:40 UTC → May 17, 12:36 UTC
- BUYRC Deportivo La Coruña vs. FC Andorra: O/U 0.5$9.4K@96¢May 17, 12:36 UTC
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$9.4K
1 trades
30d volume
$9.4K
1 trades
Buy share
100%
Sample
low
1 ledger trades
Top market concentration
RC Deportivo La Coruña vs. FC Andorra: O/U 0.5
$9.4K · 100% of recorded whale volume
Recorded market concentration
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $1.4K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 22, 19:21 UTC
- Last active
- May 22, 21:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".