Altruistic-Conception
0x5fb42e28e0ac661b712e90c27c2104fce19d90f3
Wallet digest
Activity score
71/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$130.18
Total PnL
$-38.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- UNDER
AFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
271 shares @ 48.0¢·now 48.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$130.00
$0.00
- NO
Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Henan FC: Both Teams to Score
365 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.18
$-189.82
- NO
Will Southampton FC win on 2026-04-18?
1522 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 18, 2026$0.00
$-700.00
- UNDER
1. FC Heidenheim 1846 vs. 1. FC Union Berlin: O/U 2.5
1458 shares @ 47.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-688.92
- UNDER
Auckland FC vs. Melbourne Victory FC: O/U 2.5
1220 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- NO
Will CR Vasco da Gama win on 2026-03-22?
1208 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-580.00
- UNDER
Thunder vs. Suns: O/U 214.5
1182 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-591.00
- NO
Will Melbourne City FC win on 2026-04-12?
1087 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- KNICKS
1H Spread: Hornets (-7.5)
1029 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-442.30
- UNDER
CF Estrela da Amadora vs. FC Porto: O/U 2.5
1025 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-492.20
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$30.47May 19, 08:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYAFC Bournemouth vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$101.56May 19, 08:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYTianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Henan FC: Both Teams to Score$50.72May 19, 04:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYTianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Henan FC: Both Teams to Score$101.44May 19, 04:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYTianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Henan FC: Both Teams to Score$40.58May 19, 04:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$40.61May 19, 04:50 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Dallas Wings (-4.5)$20.41May 19, 04:08 UTC
- REDEEMArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$425.53May 19, 04:08 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: Dallas Wings (-3.5)$754.72May 19, 04:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Hermannstadt win on 2026-05-18?$101.56May 18, 16:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Hermannstadt win on 2026-05-18?$101.56May 18, 16:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Dallas Wings (-3.5)$202.82May 18, 16:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Dallas Wings (-4.5)$10.15May 18, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Dallas Wings (-3.5)$101.41May 18, 16:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Dallas Wings (-3.5)$101.41May 18, 16:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Beijing Guoan FC win on 2026-05-19?$40.64May 18, 12:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Goa win on 2026-05-18?$101.59May 18, 11:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$101.59May 18, 11:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Burnley FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$101.59May 18, 11:22 UTC
- REDEEMWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-05-17?$285.71May 18, 03:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 36
- Avg trade size
- $85.56
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 17:50 UTC
- Last active
- May 19, 08:58 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".