Nocturnal-Construction
0x6fb4eb99da1b74e6b8c75fb90c77035a1d3668c3
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
97
Open notional
$15.82
Total PnL
$-1.8K
Realised
$13.58
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 97- OVER
Shanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 1.5
12 shares @ 77.0¢·now 77.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$9.06
$0.06
- OVER
Auckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5
10 shares @ 73.0¢·now 70.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$6.76
$-0.24
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 23, 7:25PM-7:30PM ET
1577 shares @ 6.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 23, 2026$0.00
$-99.91
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 23, 7:40PM-7:45PM ET
341 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 23, 2026$0.00
$-98.94
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 24, 4:30AM-4:35AM ET
230 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 24, 2026$0.00
$-29.90
- OVER
CA Huracán vs. CA San Lorenzo de Almagro: O/U 1.5
212 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-106.00
- OVER
Sunderland AFC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 1.5
172 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
Manchester City FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5
157 shares @ 63.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
- OVER
SSC Bari vs. Spezia Calcio: O/U 1.5
143 shares @ 68.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-98.00
- OVER
Deportivo Táchira FC vs. Club The Strongest: O/U 1.5
137 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYShanghai Haigang FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 1.5$9.06May 22, 20:35 UTC
- REDEEMSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 1.5$8.33May 20, 23:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAuckland FC vs. Sydney FC: O/U 1.5$7.06May 20, 16:16 UTC
- TRADESELLLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: O/U 1.5$7.78May 20, 16:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: O/U 1.5$9.05May 20, 11:30 UTC
- REDEEMChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 1.5$8.54May 19, 22:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Aston Villa FC: O/U 1.5$6.05May 19, 17:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: O/U 1.5$6.04May 19, 17:15 UTC
- REDEEMTianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Henan FC: O/U 1.5$12.65May 19, 17:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYTianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Henan FC: O/U 1.5$9.06May 18, 19:44 UTC
- REDEEMNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 1.5$8.97May 18, 05:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 1.5$7.04May 17, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYNashville SC vs. Los Angeles FC: O/U 1.5$7.05May 17, 19:53 UTC
- TRADESELLRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Villarreal CF: O/U 1.5$12.49May 17, 19:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Girona FC: O/U 1.5$10.05May 17, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Villarreal CF: O/U 1.5$10.06May 17, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYSevilla FC vs. Real Madrid CF: O/U 1.5$10.06May 17, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Oviedo vs. Deportivo Alavés: O/U 1.5$10.10May 17, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYAtalanta BC vs. Bologna FC 1909: O/U 1.5$10.09May 17, 16:32 UTC
- TRADESELLEverton FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 1.5$11.67May 17, 16:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $9.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 10, 21:11 UTC
- Last active
- May 22, 20:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".