Woozy-Rap
0x74f9f853f322018eca66838b35de55db10f7fc5a
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
200
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-45.14
Realised
$-0.46
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- YES
Will RC Celta de Vigo vs. Levante UD end in a draw?
200 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.20
- YES
Will RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-12?
200 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.20
- NASHVILLE SC
Spread: Nashville SC (-1.5)
168 shares @ 3.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-5.76
- NO
Will Real Betis Balompié win on 2026-05-12?
105 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.15
- NO
Will Al Nassr Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club end in a draw?
105 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.15
- NO
Will Levante UD win on 2026-05-12?
100 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.10
- YES
Will Elche CF win on 2026-05-12?
100 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 12, 2026$0.00
$-0.10
- PUMAS DE LA UNAM
Spread: Pumas de la UNAM (-1.5)
54 shares @ 15.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-8.16
- LOS ANGELES FC
Spread: Los Angeles FC (-1.5)
46 shares @ 2.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-1.14
- UP
XRP Up or Down - December 9, 4:00PM-8:00PM ET
20 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-0.20
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Hazem SC (-1.5)$0.05May 21, 20:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$0.05May 21, 20:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$0.05May 21, 20:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill NEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club end in a draw?$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$0.01May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill NEOM SC win on 2026-05-21?$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$0.00May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNEOM SC vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Hilal Saudi Club (-2.5)$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Fayha Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Fayha Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club end in a draw?$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Hilal Saudi Club (-1.5)$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Fayha Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Nassr Saudi Club (-2.5)$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Fayha Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club: O/U 1.5$0.05May 21, 19:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Hilal Saudi Club win on 2026-05-21?$0.05May 21, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Kholood Saudi Club vs. Al Fateh Saudi Club end in a draw?$0.05May 21, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Al Kholood Saudi Club win on 2026-05-21?$0.05May 21, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Kholood Saudi Club vs. Al Fateh Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score$0.05May 21, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Kholood Saudi Club vs. Al Fateh Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$0.05May 21, 19:55 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $0.04
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 21, 19:42 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 20:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".