Astonishing-Trading
0x779a9702c5043ab56bcb7dc90b4a1f27ad77b689
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
7
Open notional
$3.2K
Total PnL
$-7.8K
Realised
$-320.50
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- HUGO DELLIEN
Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien
2440 shares @ 82.0¢·now 88.5¢·exp May 26, 2026$2.2K
$158.60
- BORNA GOJO
Roland Garros, Qualification ATP: Borna Gojo vs Sascha Gueymard-Wayenburg
1000 shares @ 86.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 26, 2026$999.50
$139.50
- NEW YORK LIBERTY
New York Liberty vs. Portland Fire
4979 shares @ 82.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-4.1K
- IGA SWIATEK
Madrid Open: Iga Swiatek vs Ann Li
2212 shares @ 92.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-2.0K
- DALLAS WINGS
Spread: Atlanta Dream (-3.5)
1640 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
- MINNESOTA LYNX
Atlanta Dream vs. Minnesota Lynx
696 shares @ 87.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-605.42
- WASHINGTON MYSTICS
Spread: Dallas Wings (-4.5)
117 shares @ 36.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-42.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$1.9KMay 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$13.12May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$4.10May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$12.30May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$4.92May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$8.20May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$24.60May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$4.92May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$7.38May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$9.02May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Sean Cuenin vs Hugo Dellien$9.07May 19, 11:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYRoland Garros, Qualification ATP: Borna Gojo vs Sascha Gueymard-Wayenburg$863.61May 19, 10:07 UTC
- REDEEMBengaluru 3: Dominik Palan vs Kokoro Isomura$1.0KMay 19, 09:45 UTC
- TRADESELLIstanbul: Paulo Dos Santos vs Denis Yevseyev$362.02May 19, 09:02 UTC
- REDEEMBengaluru 3: Digvijaypratap Singh vs Leo Vithoontien$1.0KMay 19, 08:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYIstanbul: Paulo Dos Santos vs Denis Yevseyev$678.11May 19, 08:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYIstanbul: Paulo Dos Santos vs Denis Yevseyev$152.66May 19, 08:21 UTC
- REDEEMBengaluru 3: Christopher Papa vs Petr Bar Biryukov$356.86May 19, 07:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYBengaluru 3: Dominik Palan vs Kokoro Isomura$214.78May 19, 07:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYBengaluru 3: Dominik Palan vs Kokoro Isomura$20.90May 19, 07:27 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $176.52
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 14:23 UTC
- Last active
- May 19, 11:21 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".