Sorrowful-Rule
0x8690343b4a671583b5b9a0557dbe100095de5875
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
34
Open notional
$2.7K
Total PnL
$-3.5K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 34- UNDER
Albirex Niigata vs. Ehime FC: O/U 3.5
555 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$554.72
$0.28
- OVER
Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 2.5
428 shares @ 99.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$427.95
$1.11
- OVER
Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 1.5
292 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$291.36
$0.15
- OVER
Sagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5
236 shares @ 98.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$235.68
$3.36
- YES
Renofa Yamaguchi FC vs. Roasso Kumamoto: Both Teams to Score
210 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$210.30
$0.11
- YES
Nara Club vs. Kataller Toyama: Both Teams to Score
205 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$204.90
$0.15
- YES
Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: Both Teams to Score
193 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$192.62
$0.10
- YES
Thespa Gunma vs. SC Sagamihara: Both Teams to Score
75 shares @ 99.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$74.74
$0.17
- OVER
Thespa Gunma vs. SC Sagamihara: O/U 4.5
70 shares @ 99.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$69.97
$0.13
- OVER
Thespa Gunma vs. SC Sagamihara: O/U 3.5
65 shares @ 99.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 23, 2026$64.97
$0.08
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYAlbirex Niigata vs. Ehime FC: O/U 3.5$2.43May 23, 07:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYRenofa Yamaguchi FC vs. Roasso Kumamoto: Both Teams to Score$199.80May 23, 07:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYRenofa Yamaguchi FC vs. Roasso Kumamoto: Both Teams to Score$10.40May 23, 07:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5$85.94May 23, 07:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5$9.98May 23, 07:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYNara Club vs. Kataller Toyama: Both Teams to Score$199.80May 23, 07:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 1.5$44.96May 23, 07:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 2.5$131.75May 23, 06:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5$109.89May 23, 06:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: Both Teams to Score$59.94May 23, 06:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 1.5$201.01May 23, 06:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYAlbirex Niigata vs. Ehime FC: O/U 3.5$507.06May 23, 06:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYAlbirex Niigata vs. Ehime FC: O/U 3.5$44.96May 23, 06:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: Both Teams to Score$9.99May 23, 06:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: O/U 4.5$31.00May 23, 06:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYSagan Tosu vs. FC Ryūkyū: O/U 2.5$26.59May 23, 06:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYAlbirex Niigata vs. Ehime FC: O/U 1.5$10.89May 23, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: Both Teams to Score$15.60May 23, 06:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYSanfrecce Hiroshima vs. Nagoya Grampus: Both Teams to Score$166.93May 23, 06:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYAlbirex Niigata vs. Ehime FC: O/U 1.5$12.46May 23, 06:39 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $60.21
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 23, 04:41 UTC
- Last active
- May 23, 07:33 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".