Steel-Hometown
0x8888a4f8c8d3834482d77405530d7f5428a40b39
Wallet digest
Activity score
72/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
200
Open notional
$4.3K
Total PnL
$-61.1K
Realised
$-399.06
Win rate
43%
53 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 200- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $100,000 in May?
1883 shares @ 97.9¢·now 99.6¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$1.9K
$31.07
- NO
Will Bitcoin reach $95,000 in May?
1703 shares @ 96.9¢·now 99.0¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$1.7K
$34.28
- YES
Solstice FDV above $150M one day after launch?
1000 shares @ 74.0¢·now 66.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$665.00
$-74.84
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $90,000 in May?
2412 shares @ 3.3¢·now 2.1¢·exp Jun 1, 2026$49.44
$-29.99
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 22, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET
68000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-68.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 2:35PM-2:40PM ET
10288 shares @ 56.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-5.8K
- UP
Solana Up or Down - March 8, 2AM ET
9796 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-97.96
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - February 14, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET
9660 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-133.29
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - March 5, 7:15AM-7:20AM ET
9046 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 5, 2026$0.00
$-81.42
- UP
Solana Up or Down - March 7, 3:10AM-3:15AM ET
8249 shares @ 0.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-74.24
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$167.82May 21, 17:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$167.83May 21, 17:52 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$3.47May 21, 17:22 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin dip to $65,000 in May?$3.50May 21, 17:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in May?$0.32May 21, 17:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolstice FDV above $150M one day after launch?$753.31May 21, 11:54 UTC
- REFERRAL_REWARD$63.77May 21, 00:35 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$379.75May 20, 18:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in May?$16.27May 20, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in May?$16.27May 20, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in May?$16.27May 20, 17:36 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in May?$153.73May 20, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$253.64May 20, 15:40 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$2.63May 20, 15:40 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$3.50May 20, 15:40 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$5.01May 20, 15:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$5.32May 20, 15:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$28.04May 20, 15:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$26.77May 20, 15:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $78,000 on May 20?$13.74May 20, 15:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $99.45
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 20, 14:30 UTC
- Last active
- May 21, 17:53 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 53 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".